Skip to main content

Flip-flopping with John Kasich

Ohio Governor John Kasich recently got himself into a bit of a pickle. When speaking with the Associated Press, Kasich said that the repeal of "Obamacare" is "never going to happen."

He also said that the "political or ideological" opposition to the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare") - the Medicaid expansion in particular - doesn't "hold water against real flesh and blood, and real improvements in people's lives."

After likely receiving some backlash for his statements, Kasich went to the Washington Post to "clarify" his position, when he said:

"I don't back Obamacare. I never have. I want it to be repealed. If the House and the Senate [are Republican-controlled] and we have a Republican president, Obamacare will be repealed flat out. Flat out. And it will be replaced."

Okay, so Kasich went from saying the Affordable Care Act wasn't going to get repealed and that improving people's lives was of far greater importance than trying to repeal the healthcare law just for political reasons to he wants the ACA to be repealed and it will happen if the GOP has control of the House, the Senate, and the White House. Interesting...

Sadly, Kasich's dancing about the issue didn't stop there.

The Ohio Governor then spoke to Politico, where he said this:

"I have favored expanding Medicaid, but I don't really see expanding Medicaid as really connected to Obamacare. [If Republicans take the Senate,] you better believe they're going to repeal Obamacare and I agree with that. {But], there's got to be an accommodation [for Medicaid expansion]."

So, let's try to make sense of this and go about Kasich's statements chronologically:

1) ACA won't get repealed and people's lives are more important than partisan politics

2) He wants to repeal the ACA and it will happen if the GOP gets its way

3) The GOP will repeal the ACA if it gets its way, which he's in favor of, but he's also in favor of expanding Medicaid, which is a component of the ACA, but claims isn't.

Okay then... John Kasich sounds confused. Based on all of his dancing about the issue of "Obamacare," I could see him engage in the following discussion at some point in the future:

Reporter Jan Udintjusaythat: "So, what's your stance on the Affordable Care Act?"

John Kasich: "I want Obamacare to be fully repealed!"

Udintjusaythat: "What about the part where it gives the option of expanding Medicaid?"

Kasich: "I'm in favor of expanding Medicaid."

Udintjusaythat: "Does that mean you don't want the Affordable Care Act fully repealed?"

Kasich: "Yes, yes I do."

Udintjusaythat: "But you just said you were in favor of expanding Medicaid..."

Kasich: "That's correct."

Udintjusaythat: "So, how can you be in favor of fully repealing the healthcare law while also being strongly in favor of a central component of it?"

Kasich: "What component is that?"

Udintjusaythat: "Expanding Medicaid..."

Kasich: "Yes, I'm in favor of that."

Udintjusaythat: "So then, you're not in favor of fully repealing the Affordable Care Act?"

Kasich: "Yes, yes I am."

Udintjusaythat: "But, expanding Medicaid is a part of the Affordable Care Act. If you fully repeal the healthcare law, the expansion of Medicaid will go along with it."

Kasich: "No it won't. Expanding Medicaid does, but doesn't have anything to do with Obamacare."

Udintjusaythat: "It does."

Kasich: "Not completely"

Udintjusaythat: "So then, you're in favor of partially repealing the healthcare law, so you can maintain the bit about expanding Medicaid?"

Kasich: "No, I want a full repeal of Obamacare!"

Udintjusaythat: "Including the part where you can expand Medicaid?"

Kasich: "No, I want to expand Medicaid."

Udintjusaythat: "You're impossible!"

Kasich: "That's what my wife says a lot of times."

Udintjusaythat: "She's right!"

Kasich: "She is and she's not."

Udintjusaythat: "Ugh! I'm leaving!!"

http://twitchy.com/2014/10/20/gov-john-mr-medicaid-expansion-kasich-takes-pro-obamacare-rhetoric-a-step-further-clarifies/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/21/1338199/-Republican-presidential-hopeful-accidentally-tells-truth-about-Obamacare-flip-flops-with-the-crazy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"