Skip to main content

The Ebola Craze

While we mustn't take Ebola lightly, it really amazes me how news channels have blown the situation completely out of proportion and how many people have started panicking as a result. Unless a person is traveling from West Africa or has had direct contact with a person whom is suffering from the condition, there's nothing to worry about.

As Ohio Department of Health (ODH) state epidemiologist Dr. Mary DiOrio recently stated, "Only individuals who travel to or from West Africa, where the Ebola outbreak is occurring, or individuals in close contact with someone ill with Ebola [need to worry about getting sick]."

Let's put things in their proper perspective for a second here. In 2010, here were the leading causes of death in this country:

1) Heart disease: 596,577

2) Cancer: 576,691

3) Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 142,943

4) Accidents (unintentional injuries): 126,438

5) Alzheimer's disease: 84,974

6) Diabetes: 73,831

7) Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,826

8) Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 45,591

In 2013, there were a total of 32,351 deaths via firearms.

To this point, there has been 1 reported death in this country via Ebola, and a total of 3 people whom have contracted it.

Yes, while we should take the Ebola threat seriously, why are some people, news networks, and politicians panicking and going paranoid about a condition which has directly affected three people and killed one in this country to this point, and been seemingly indifferent about the 32,351 people whom died of gun violence last year? Or the tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of people whom die every year of far more common health conditions, such as heart disease and cancer? Wouldn't our time, energy, and money be much better spent on trying to decrease the number of deaths of far more common causes of it? It seems pretty ridiculous for the following reactions to occur when comparing Ebola to something which resulted in far more casualties:

Event: Sandy Hook school shooting (27 people were shot and killed)

Citizens: "Oh no! That's so sad!"

The news: "Unfortunately, this kind of thing happens far too often anymore in this country."

Politicians: "What will passing stricter laws do? Guns don't kill people; people kill people - over 30,000 with guns!"


Event: Ebola (3 people contract it and 1 person dies)

Citizens/The news/Politicians (in unison): "Oh no! We're all gonna die!!!"

http://www.cleveland.com/healthfit/index.ssf/2014/10/ebola_should_not_be_a_concern.html

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...