Skip to main content

The Columbus Dispatch unintentionally proves their conservative bias

So, I got a good laugh in this morning. As I normally do every day, I checked out the Columbus Dispatch letters-to-the-editor because I tend to find the majority of them so ridiculous, I either shake my head and laugh or feel the need to rebut the letter(s) with those crazy things called facts. It was a different story with a letter I read today. I laughed, but not at the letter that was written. I laughed at the headline the Dispatch decided to use for the letter.

The letter was written by one John C. Hamler of Columbus, and read as follows:

"The Saturday Dispatch editorial 'A pattern of failure' is yet another biased bashing of the Obama administration.

Since the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, the Republican plan for America is to cut taxes for the rich, take jobs from the middle class, cut benefits to the poor and take the vote away from those who don't support them.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ensured that the Republican Party is the best that money can buy; Republican gerrymandering has made voting irrelevant, and the bias of The Dispatch has proved it to be nothing more than a Republican publication.

So when it comes to controlling democracy and protecting the elite, the Chinese have nothing on us."

So, guess what headline the Dispatch used for this letter? I'll give you a few options:

A) The Biased Dispatch

B) Cheating is the Only Way the GOP Can Win

C) The GOP Only Cares About the Top 1%

D) To the GOP, the Poor Smell Like Cow Dung

E) The Columbus Dispatch Does Their Best Fox News Impersonation

F) The RepubliCAN Party Has Turned Into the RepubliCON Party

G) GOP Has a Lot Going For It In Ohio, U.S.

If you answered anything between the letters "A" and "F," I'm sorry, but you'd be incorrect. The correct answer is "G."

That's right, after this man bashed the Columbus Dispatch for being too conservatively biased and went on to criticize the Republican Party, the Dispatch decided to prove this bias by titling the piece, "GOP Has a Lot Going For It in Ohio, U.S." Perhaps they should have elongated the headline some to give readers a clearer picture, to something like, "GOP Has a Lot Going For It in Ohio, U.S., Largely Due to Conservatively Biased Media Outlets Such as the Columbus Dispatch, Which This Man Called Us Out On, and We Proved By Distorting the Message the Author Was Trying To Convey." Okay, perhaps they'll have to condense that a bit, to something like, "GOP Has a Lot Going For It in Ohio Due to the Columbus Dispatch." There, that's better.

Well, I must be going. I'm now going to write a letter-to-the-editor to the Dispatch which lists a large number of examples of their bias. It's my bet they'll title the piece, "Man Shares His Love For the Dispatch." Yeah, that's it...

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2014/10/08/1-a-lot-going-for-gop.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"