Skip to main content

GOP, the ladies just aren't that into you...

After consistently losing the woman's vote on election day and that demographic leaning progressively left in the most recent election cycles, the Republican Party has tried appealing more to women voters. However, these efforts have failed on a grander scale than Mel Gibson would if he taught a Sympathy-For-Jews class. The main problem is the Republican Party doesn't seem to understand why women don't see them in a positive light and lean more toward Democrats come election day. They appear to think their problem is not being in touch with a woman's hobbies and interests, as opposed to their voting records when it comes to women's issues. According to them, if women heard Republican candidates speaking against women's rights in a kinder manner, by acknowledging a common interest of theirs, they'd vote for them in greater numbers.

In the latest example of this, a Republican group has aired an ad which compares women's votes to the reality television show, Say Yes to the Dress, which centers around women picking out a wedding gown.

In this ad, the bride-to-be says this: "Mom, this is my decision. And I see a better future with Rick Scott."

Rick Scott is the current Florida Republican Governor, who is running for re-election against Democratic candidate Charlie Crist.

I find the bride-to-be's line in the ad to be ironically humorous, because she tells her mother that it's her decision to vote for the Republican candidate, yet most Republican candidates, including Rick Scott, don't believe in her right to decide what to do if she gets pregnant.

Given where the Republican Party has largely stood on a host of women's issues, the line in the ad should instead be something like this:

"Mom, this is my decision. And even though he doesn't believe in my reproductive rights, in my overall health and well-being, or even in me receiving equal pay for equal work, I see a better future with Rick Scott."

Republican candidates can tell women it's their decision to vote for them until they're blue in the face, that's not going to matter if they don't in turn believe and vote for women to have the right to make decisions about their own bodies, to receive equal pay for equal work, and to ultimately be treated like equal members of society.

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2014/10/01/3574672/say-yes-to-the-candidate/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"