Skip to main content

Quentin Tarantino + police = Pulp Friction

Yes, the title of this blog is probably facepalm-worthy to most, but I simply couldn't resist. Pulp Fiction and the upcoming The Hateful Eight director, Quentin Tarantino, has come under fire recently for a comment he made at an anti-police brutality rally in Manhattan, where he said, "I'm a human being with a conscience. And if you believe there's murder going on then you need to rise up and stand up against it. I'm here to say I'm on the side of the murdered."

In response, many police unions called for a boycott to all of Tarantino's films. John McNesby, president of the Philadelphia union, said this in a statement:

"Mr. Tarantino has made a good living through his films, projecting into society a large violence and respect for criminals; he it turns out also hates cops."

Then just yesterday, Tarantino was interviewed by the Los Angeles Times and responded to the boycott threats with this:

"I'm not being intimidated. Frankly, it feels lousy to have a bunch of police mouthpieces call me a cop hater. I'm not a cop hater. That is a misrepresentation. That is slanderous."

He added:

"What they're doing is pretty obvious. Instead of dealing with the incidents of police brutality that those people were bringing up; instead of examining the problem of police brutality in this country; better they single me out. And their message is very clear. It's to shut me down. It's to discredit me. It is to intimidate me. It is to shut my mouth, and even more important than that, it is to send a message out to any other prominent person that might feel the need to join that side of the argument."

Could Quentin Tarantino have been a little more careful in how he phrased his initial quote? Sure. However, did he at any time say he hated cops? No, and this goes back to a blog I wrote a couple months ago. It's felt, ever since the Black Lives Matter movement truly made their voices be known, especially with regard to members of the black community being killed by cops, a majority of the country has had the false notion that, "You're either with all cops or you're against them." This, of course, is incorrect. A Critical Thinking professor would term this a false dilemma fallacy, where a person is provided only two options when in fact there are more than two. It's also false generalization. Just because an individual like Tarantino says he hates the acts of a few cops, labeling them as murderers, that doesn't mean he believes all cops to be such. If a person said he couldn't stand the acts of an abusive mother, would this then mean he couldn't stand all mothers? No, of course not. Not only that, but despising police brutality is far different than despising police. One can respect the police force as a whole, yet not respect a small percentage of cops whom ignore the law. Why, when people expect police officers to obey the law like anyone else, are they called cop haters when they criticize an officer who doesn't? Most cops may be good, upstanding citizens, but at the same time, when a cop crosses the line and commits a criminal act, Tarantino and others like him have every right to criticize that individual. If the Oscar-winning film director ever decides to provide a false apology to the police force, he should say this: "I'm sorry for holding powerful authority figures like cops to a higher standard than the average person; I'm sorry for asking all cops to obey the law like everyone else; and I'm sorry for asking cops who overstep their bounds to be held accountable and face the legal consequences." As far as I see it, though, Quentin Tarantino has nothing for which to apologize. He never said he hated the police; he simply said he hated police brutality.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/quentin-tarantino-comments-police-brutality_56391bb2e4b0b24aee47dab3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"