Skip to main content

The Obama administration introduces the Syrian-no-boots-on-the-ground dance

While I can understand President Obama not wanting to be seen as a war president or a hypocrite, he and his administration's we're-not-putting-boots-on-the-ground-in-Syria dance has become quite the spectacle, and the longer they keep up the dance number, the more facepalm-worthy it's going to be.

This past Friday, the White House announced they'd be sending less than 50 Special Operation forces to Syria to help combat ISIL (the artist formerly known as ISIS), yes, on the ground, and perhaps wearing boots. This came after the president had long stated we weren't going to put boots on the ground in Syria.

Like I said, I can understand how the president doesn't want to be seen as a warmonger or a hypocrite, but instead of doing this crazy dance which will likely make at least one person in his administration fall flat on their face, why not just be honest and say, "I know I had said we weren't going to put boots on the ground in Syria, but unfortunately things have changed, and we need to help rebel forces combat ISIL there. So, as much as I hate to say this, I'm going to need to send some troops to Syria in order to do this. Hopefully the mission won't last long, but I feel this move is what's best for our allies in Syria and will help us stave off the threat of ISIL"?

Mr. President, people are allowed to change their minds once in a while. However, if said person changes their opinion about something, yet refuses to acknowledge it, the longer he or she stays in denial on the matter, the more ridiculous such denial is going to sound.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/03/politics/obama-syria-boots-on-the-ground/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...