Skip to main content

The best memory, the best sources, the best everything

Receiving a great deal of criticism for retweeting a white supremacist's false murder statistics on his Twitter account, even from conservative Fox News host Bill O'Reilly, GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump released this video to the press to try and silence his critics on the matter:

"Look people, so called fact-checkers have their sources and I have my sources. They have their guys and I have my guys. And let me tell you something, America, I've got the best sources, the very best guys. So I'm a little tired of the liberal media fact-checking things I've already fact-checked and know to be true. I've got the best memory in the world, so when this one guy, I forget his name, but when he comes to me with some numbers, I'm going to believe him, because I know it to be true. I know the liberal media wants names to my guys, to my sources, but unless your name is Donald Trump, what's in a name really? I mean, seriously? I'll just say I have some of these guys, some of those guys, and even some of the other guys. When I was in school and my teachers asked for sources, I put the title of some article and the person's name was "Guy, Some," and the teachers always patted me on the head and gave me a gold star, even in college. I just know things most people don't know. You nerdy losers can have your dictionaries, your encyclopedias, your thesauri, and whatever, and I'll take my guys over them each and every time! If my guy says the capital of France is Tour de and you come back and tell me it's not, I'm going to go with my guy. If my guy says 47 is less than or equal to 1 and you tell me that's not true, I'm going to go with my guy. Even if my guy says the 9/11 attacks happened in the month of February and you refute that, I'm going to go with my guy. Don't ever try to fact-check a fact-checker with the best sources, the best memory, and the best guys I can't remember the names to!"
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownNovember 26, 2015 at 12:06 AM

    Hahaha. I'm still cracking up over this blog! You've really helped open eyes to the fact that Donald Trump is a wanna be gangster/thug. Impressive! And that's why I love reading your material.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more