Skip to main content

What I learned in Week 10 of the NFL season

In Week 10 of the NFL season, I learned that...

- ...the only ones in attendance at the New York trash bowl between the Jets and Giants were rats - ten of them.

- ...the Miami Dolphins are better than I thought they were, much like getting hit by a semi-truck going 110 mph is better than getting hit by one going 111 mph.

- ..., even if the NFL were a flag football league, the Cincinnati Bengals would always find a way to lose, as every Bengals player would kneel at the sight of a flag - to the point where even Colin Kaepernick would shout, "Get your dumb asses up!"

- ...the Kansas City Chiefs defense is so bad, Northwestern could score on them.

- ...the league should permit marijuana use by players, if only to clam down one particular individual. The implementation would go by the name The Token By The (Philip) Rivers Rule.

- ...Jerry Jones and Jason Garrett are slated to co-author the book, "How to Underachieve, Ya'll."

- ...it clearly states in the NFL rule book, "If a defender grabs a hold of a receiver before the ball arrives and appears to dance with him, it is not interference. It isn't even reviewable. The receiver should just thank the defender; grab him by the hand; and take a bow alongside him."

- ...Los Angeles Rams quarterback Jared Goff may soon be nicknamed the Golden Earring of the league, as it appears he may be a two-hit wonder.

- ...a team may sign Antonio Brown just to release him, for the Steelers, Raiders, and Patriots are now a combined 18-9. The move will reportedly be referred to as, "Bye Bye SOB AB."

- ...the New Orleans Saints apparently forgot to adjust their mental clocks for Daylight Savings...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"