Skip to main content

What I learned in Week 9 of the NFL season

In Week 9 of the NFL season, I learned that...

- ...geometry class finally paid off, as since the Dolphins beat the Jets and the Jets defeated the Cowboys, through the transitive property it can be said that the Dolphins are better than the Cowboys! True? No, but it's still fun to say...

- ...the Bengals had their bye. This marked the 9th consecutive week they've essentially been off.

- ..., with Baker Mayfield and Gardner Minshew leading teams with a combined record of 6-11, expect the typically steady Moustache stock to take a deep dive late this year, into next year.

- ..., unfortunately for New York Jets quarterback Sam Darnold, while one can recover from mono, there's no known cure at this time for losing to the Miami Dolphins.

- ...Tyreek Hill has proven reincarnation to be valid, as he's obviously part cheetah.

- ...Mitchell Trubisky is the second-coming of a poor man's Trent Dilfer.

- ...Cris Collinsworth majored in Hyperbolic Rationale at Trump University (spelled Hiperbowelick Rash & Al on the Trump University homepage).

- ...I need to add something to my bucket list: Watching Tom Brady vs. Melvin Gordon run the hurdles. The event would be tentatively titled "The Tortoise and the Hare, Part Over Before It Starts."

- ..., sadly, at the young age of 162, Adam Vinatieri has come down with the yips.

- ...the end of the world as we know it is upon us, for the following three signs merged into one on Sunday: 1) Three quarterbacks with the surname of Allen won (Kyle, Josh, and Brandon); 2) Road teams went 0-11; and Tony Romo, moved to the sideline, failed to make a Packers/Chargers game exciting.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"