Skip to main content

Father Paul (Ron) comes to son's rescue!

Two of the early favorites to represent the Republican Party in the 2016 presidential election - Chris Christie and Rand Paul - have been going going at it in recent weeks - with Christie criticizing Paul's libertarian leanings and Paul criticizing Christie for allegedly being about big government. Well, Rand needn't worry anymore, because his father and former Republican candidate in just about every presidential primary since 2000 it seems - Ron Paul - has made his voice known on the matter.

Speaking with Neil Cavuto on Fox News, the elder Paul had this to say on the recent bickering between his son and Christie:

"That would be safe to say (about not being a Christie fan). He's not going to have a change of heart. He's a big government person. It would be similar to the last go-around. I couldn't endorse our candidate. ... I don't like the bickering back and forth. I think it was significant debate -- one person blasting those of us who believe in liberty and saying you shouldn't be that critical of government. That is significant, but still again two politicians going at it. I would much rather talk about why we should have a Fed or why we shouldn't."

Yes, because in the world of Ron Paul and those like him, any government constitutes as big government!

If Rand Paul does in fact run for the presidency in 2016, it's nice to know he'll have quite the staunch supporter in his father. Ron will likely have a weekly segment on his coming how titled, "In Defense of My Son - Little Randy." During this segment, it's all but inevitable Paul will utter the following lines:

- "Chris Matthews... I heard what you said about my son. You're grounded!"

- "Ed Schultz - why don't you pick on someone your own size, huh?"

- "Ms. Maddow - you've been a bad girl! Go to your room!"

- "Mr. Sharpton, I would have smacked you with a belt if you were my son and I heard you say such things about another child! But, you're not, so I'm going to smack you upside the head for saying that stuff about my son!"

- "Jon Stewart - I used to like you, but not anymore after hearing you badmouth my son. That's it! I've had it! No more allowance for you!"

- "Yeah, this goes out to that French guy on Comedy Central - Colbert. You have absolutely no right to tease my son's pube-like hair - I mean, you have no right to claim he has pube-like hair! That's immature, not at all funny, and just downright cruel! Now go and stand in the corner and I'll call and let you know when you can come out."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/13/ron-paul-chris-christie_n_3748464.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"