Skip to main content

The Global Warming Conspiracy

Global-warming conspiracists crack me up sometimes. Due to that, it should come as no surprise that when reading California Representative Dana Rohrabacher's conspiratorial comments on the topic earlier today, it prompted quite the chuckle. What makes this especially humorous is the fact that Rohrabacher is a long-time member of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.

With regard to climate-change, Rohrabacher said this:

"Just so you'll know, global warming is a total fraud and it's being designed because what you've got is you've got liberals who get elected at the local level want state government to do the work and let them make the decisions. Then, at the state level, they want the federal government to do it. And at the federal government, they want to create global government to control all of our lives. It's step by step by step, more and bigger control over our lives by higher levels of government. And global warming is that strategy is spades. Our freedom to make our choices on transportation and everything else? No, that's gotta be done by a government official who, by the way, probably comes from Nigeria because he's a UN government official, not a US government official."

Yes, it's been the government's intent all along to simultaneously improve business and destroy the environment in order to more strictly regulate business to improve the environment. That makes sense.

It also makes me laugh how a growing number of modern-day Republicans come across as being anti-government while being a part of the government. If Mr. Rohrabacher were to engage in a conversation with an inquisitive child (yes, that may be redundant), I picture the following discussion taking place:

George Curious: "So, is global warming real?"

Rohrabacher: "No! It's nonsense, just like Santa Claus! I mean, it's nonsense, unlike Santa Claus!"

Curious: "What about the scientists who say it's real?"

Rohrabacher: "They're all in on it!"

Curious: "In on what? I don't understand."

Rohrabacher: "You see, George, scientists and Democrats and liberals all over the place are just using this global warming tale to try and take over the world!"

Curious: "Really?"

Rohrabacher: "Absolutely! I've never been so certain of anything in my life!"

Curious: "So, the government is using it to try and take over the world?"

Rohrabacher: "Now you're catching on! You're a bright one, George!"

Curious: "What do you do for a living again?"

Rohrabacher: "I work for the government."

Curious: "So, you're not 'in on it,' as you said?"

Rohrabacher: "No, of course not! I'm talking about the government here!"

Curious: "But aren't you a part of the government?"

Rohrabacher: "Yes, but I'm one of the good guys - working on the inside of the government to try and stop the government from doing anything."

Curious: "So, it'd be like my dad, who's a doctor, trying to stop all the other doctors from doing anything?"

Rohrabacher: "No, that's completely different."

Curious: "How so?"

Rohrabacher: "I may have to get back to you on that one."

Curious: "Hasn't it been getting warmer, though?"

Rohrabacher: "Yeah - so?"

Curious: "Yet, you don't believe in global warming?"

Rohrabacher: "Never!"

Curious: "If your temperature started getting warmer, would you not say you had a fever?"

Rohrabacher: "But that's different..."

Curious: "How so?"

Rohrabacher: "I'll have to get back to you on that one too. You ask some good questions. Well, anyway, for as much as I've enjoyed this conversation, I must be going to try and stop the government!"

Curious: "But you're a part of the government..."

Rohrabacher: "I know, but..."

Curious: "But what?"

Rohrabacher: "I'll have to get back to you on that..."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/12/dana-rohrabacher-global-warming_n_3743390.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"