Skip to main content

The 10-year anniversary of my brain surgery

I don't usually get personal with these blogs, but I will here. Today's kind of a special day for me. In late August of 1999, I suffered a grand mal seizure, was rushed to the hospital, and upon getting some scans done, the doctors told me they spotted a tumor on the left anterior-lobe portion of my brain. Through the following days, weeks, months, and years, I'd regularly get it checked, be told no growth was detected, and through medication, the seizures were neutralized. That was until February 20th of 2003, when I suffered a complex-partial seizure while in my college Spanish class. After going to the doctor's and getting placed on yet another medication, my neurologist told me I could continue to get placed on more meds every time a seizure occurred or I could try to ween myself off the meds after having my tumor removed surgically. Without a great deal of hesitation, and to my parents' dismay - both of whom were in the room with the doctor and I at the time - I said I wanted to undergo surgery. After being in and out of the hospital throughout the summer of 2003, I went in for the surgery on August 6th of that year. We're now exactly 10 years removed from that procedure, I'm about a year and a half removed from taking any form of anti-seizure medication, and not only has the tumor not grown back, but I've yet to experience a seizure since the surgery. While I will still experience auras from time to time, if that's all I have to worry about from this point forward, I will gladly take it. Considering I had battled seizures pretty much since birth, this is definitely the longest duration of time I've ever gone in not experiencing a full-blown seizure. While my friends and family appeared rather nervous about the surgery, I was confident, long-term, that I was making the right decision, and am very happy to look back at the past 10 years and know that it was indeed the right decision. Here's to another 10 such years. ::cheers::

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"