Skip to main content

Pat Robertson said what?

There can be no mistaking it - televangelist Pat Robertson is crazier than Tom Cruise hopped up on speed while on the Oprah Winfrey Show. He's let loose more facepalm-inducing quotes than drunken Richard Pryor-impersonating sailors have let the F-bomb slip.

Robertson's latest such statement he made during a recent episode of The 700 Club, where he said this:

"You know what they do in San Francisco? Some in the gay community there, they want to get people. So if they got the stuff (AIDS) they'll have a ring, you shake hands and the ring's got a little thing where you cut your finger. Really. It's that kind of vicious stuff, which would be the equivalent of murder."

Yeah, that kind of thing REALLY happens, Pat. Here's how such an event would transpire:

Lance Lancestopherson (the most flamboyant gay man in the world): ::ponders to himself:: "Who should I infect today with my magical AIDS ring? It's about time I get with the program and break this bad boy in like all the others in this city!"

Jack Mehoff: ::whistles "The Star-Spangled Banner"::

Lancestopherson: ::spots Jack:: "Ooh, he'll be the lucky one!"

Mehoff: ::continues whistling - getting to the part about bombs in the air::

Lancetopherson: ::appraoches Mehoff and lightly bumps into him:: "Oh, I'm so sorry, sir. I got so distracted by that beautiful song you were whistling. I'm sorry. By the way, I'm Pat, Pat Robertson." ::goes to shake Jack's hand::

Mehoff: "Hi, Pat. Oh, that's alright. These kinds of things happen. I'm Jack, Jack Mehoff." ::reaches to shake Lance's hand::

::the two shake hands::

Mehoff: "Ow! What the hell was that? Why am I bleeding? What did you do?"

Lancetopherson: "Ha! Take that! You've got AIDS! Oh my God! What did you do to my ring? There's blood all over it! My beautiful ring!" ::slaps Jack across the face a few times:: "You b**ch!"


Yeah, apparently there's homophobia, homoringophobia, and flipping nuts. If you answered D) - that Pat Robertson is all of those things - you would be correct!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/27/pat-robertson-aids-rings_n_3824401.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"