Skip to main content

Steve King believes climate change is more of a religion than a science

Iowa Representative Steve King has never been coy about acting stupid. Even at a frat party in college, he was voted the stupidest and craziest drunk, even though he was sober. Well, the Iowa Rep is back at it again.

During a speech on Wednesday at an event sponsored by the Koch-funded Americans For Prosperity, King told the audience the following:

- [Climate change] is not proven, it's not science. It's more of a religion than a science."

- "Everything that might result from a warmer planet is always bad in (environmentalists') analysis. There will be more photosynthesis going on if the Earth gets warmer. ...And if sea levels go up 4 to 6 inches, I don't know if we'd know that."

Even though 97% of scientists agree that climate change does in fact exist, King still claims that it's more of a religion than a science. King may want to re-evaluate how he defines science and religion.

Religion is dependent upon faith, whereas science is dependent upon testing, numbers, and hard evidence. Christianity is not a science. We can not ultimately test the theory that Jesus was born from a virgin woman, died on a cross for all of mankind's sins, rose from the dead three days later, and all those whom believe in and worship him shall live eternally in a paradise known as heaven. The only way to know if this theory is true is for us to die and find out what happens as a result. It's not like, through testing, 44% of scientists believe Mary was indeed a virgin when giving birth to Jesus, 31% believe Jesus rose from the dead three days after dying, and 19% believe those whom believe in and worship him will live eternally in heaven. All it's based on is blind faith. Climate change, meanwhile, is something that can actually be observed, and hard evidence has resulted in 97% of scientists believing it exists. Actual data backs up the notion that temperatures have been rising worldwide. These aren't claims that were made 900 years ago in a meteorological sacred book entitled The Holy Climate, where Ten Commandments were given to prevent global warming. This is something that is occurring in the real world - something it seems Steve King and his ilk have a difficulty grasping at times.

When envisioning King talking to a scientist about such matters, the following conversation comes to mind:

Scientist Roger Smartypants: "So, you don't believe in climate change?"

Steve King: "Nope. It's more of a religion than a science."

Smartypants: "How so?"

King: "There's just no proof."

Smartypants: "What about data that showcases rising temperatures?"

King: "Those are just numbers. What's that tell?"

Smartypants: "That the earth is a great deal warmer than it was previously, hence the name 'global warming.'"

King: "That still doesn't prove anything."

Smartypants: "What about the polar ice melting and sea levels rising?"

King: "So? So what?"

Smartypants: "Doesn't that again prove the earth is a great deal warmer than it had been and prove that climate change is real?"

King: "No"

Smartypants: "Alright, so what will have to happen for you to become a believer in climate change?"

King: "I don't know. Nothing that I can think of."

Smartypants: "Are you a Christian?"

King: "Yes, and very proud of it!"

Smartypants: "So, you believe that Mary was a virgin when she became impregnated with Jesus?"

King: "Yep"

Smartypants: "...and you believe Jesus was perfect and died for all of our sins?"

King: "Yes again"

Smartypants: "...and you believe that he rose again three days after dying?"

King: "Yes, sir"

Smartypants: "...and you believe everyone whom believes in and worships him will spend eternity with him in heaven?"

King: "Yeah"

Smartypants: "You really believe all of those things?"

King: "I don't just believe it; I know it!"

Smartypants: "How do you know it?"

King: "I just do"

Smartypants: "Did you ever meet Mary or Jesus?"

King: "No"

Smartypants: "So how do you know, first-hand, that all you believe is true?"

King: "It's in the Bible."

Smartypants: "Did you write that book yourself or were you around the time it was written?"

King: "No, of course not"

Smartypants: "So, how do you know you're interpreting everything in that book correctly?"

King: "I can just feel it."

Smartypants: "Alright... So you believe all of that, which you can't see nor prove, yet you don't believe in climate change, even though it's been documented that the temperatures have been rising, as have the sea levels due to the melting of polar ice?"

King: "Yeah, it's just as much of a religion as Christianity - even more so, because everything in the Bible is true!"

Smartypants: "Are you an idiot? Nevermind. I believe we have enough evidence in our possession to prove that is in fact the case. Thank you for your time."

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/08/07/2429331/steve-king-climate-religion/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"