Skip to main content

The age of information is the age of misinformation

A lot of people refer to this as the age of information. We can seemingly get information at any given moment anymore, whether it be through our phones, computers, televisions, radios, and beyond. However, what many of those same people don't seem to realize is that I and many others like me spend more time than ever fact-checking this "information," and more times than not, the information we fact-check winds up being false on some level or another. So while this may be the age of information, it's also the age of misinformation.

I'm truly amazed by how much nonsense is spread on a daily basis, and the sad thing is, people buy into the nonsense and continue to spread it. It seems that the line between fact and opinion has become increasingly blurred and the definition of truth has been altered to mean whatever we want it to be. If 97% of scientists believe global warming is occurring, but an individual doesn't want to believe it, he or she can simply go to a fellow denier (one of the 3%) and claim their position to be the accurate one, without looking at the numbers, odds, and realizing that there's a very good chance they're wrong.

I honestly wonder which is worse - simply being ignorant about matters before the age of information or being ignorant about these matters during the age of information yet feeling confident about the misinformation they spread. I sincerely hope that cable-news and talk radio become more honest, credible, balanced, and journalistic in their coverage, and that people start fact-checking more and being able to properly discern between truth and fiction, between fact and opinion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...