Skip to main content

Perv Filner

San Diego mayor and man voted to have the creepiest face this side of Chucky - Bob Filner - has come under a great deal of scrutiny in recent weeks over multiple women claiming he sexually harassed them. Instead of stepping down, the mayor said he plans on going to a clinic for two weeks of "intensive therapy."

Now, Filner and his attorney, Harvery Berger, are contending that if the mayor had been mandated by the city to take sexual harassment training prior to taking office, the alleged cases of harassment would have never taken place.

As Berger wrote in a July 29th letter to City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, "Had the city provided mandatory sexual harassment training to Mayor Filner, [former spokeswoman Irene] McCormack Jackson may never have brought her lawsuit."

Really? What were some of these allegations again? That Filner forcibly kissed women, tapped their bottoms, and told them they'd work better without their panties on? Even the biggest idiot would know these are no-nos, not just in the workplace, but anywhere. It's laughable that sexual harassment training would have aided this man with his obvious issue, and possibly even more laughable that he expects us to believe two weeks of "intense therapy" will cure this man of his perversions. Either Mayor Filner is a complete moron or he's lying his tuchus off.

Mayor Filner: "I'm going to kill you!" ::shoots and kills someone who works for him::

::an arrest follows::

Filner: "Well, if I had been given the proper violence-murder training prior to stepping in office, I probably would have never done that."

Yeah, what Filner should do is step down, go to therapy for the long-haul, never enter politics again, and do women everywhere a favor by placing a bag over his head whenever he walks out of his house, which reads, "I'm Perv Filner."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323971204578630380101636980.html

http://www.kpbs.org/news/2013/jul/16/filner-defiant-details-alleged-sexual-harassment-e/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more