Skip to main content

The gay debate - Is it innate or chosen?

I personally wouldn't care one way or the other if homosexuality were innate or chosen, since I believe two people whom are in love with one another should be afforded the right to legally marry. However, if there is scientific evidence to document homosexuality as being at least partially genetic, then I think this provides LGBT supporters with a much stronger argument against religious individuals whom abhor such "lifestyles."

Now I personally feel that homosexuality is mostly, if not fully innate in most to all cases. Science has slowly been showcasing significance in this theory. Even so, though, I stumbled across a comment on the debate just recently, which I wanted to mention and counter.

In a recent Facebook debate on whether or not homosexuality was indeed a choice, I read one individual say, "I support gay people, but I chose to be straight with what I do with women. They may have had feelings they couldn't help for the same sex, but chose to be gay on what they do with these same people."

Here is where I think some people mistake what I feel is the true definition of our sexuality. When a gay man or woman decides to involve themselves in a heterosexual relationship and get married, to prolong their name and genes through reproduction, this doesn't make the person straight, in my opinion. In other words, I feel that our sexuality can't be fully defined by our actions, but more by our innate feelings toward one sex or the other (or both). People often times ask if I'm gay, largely because I regularly turn women down for one-night stands. However, I've always been sexually attracted to women, whereas I've never felt such an attraction toward men, so to me, that is much more illustrative of my sexuality than how many women I've slept with.

I think this very issue plays a large factor in whether or not people believe homosexuality to be innate or chosen and whether or not they support the LGBT community. I think people whom feel homosexuality to be a choice should ask themselves, "It may have been a choice to engage in sexual relations with a person of their own gender, but was it a choice for them to be sexually attracted to them in the first place? It may have been a choice for me to engage in sexual relations with a person of the opposite gender, but was it a choice for me to be sexually attracted to him/her in the first place?"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...