Skip to main content

Limbaugh says if you believe in God, you can't believe in global warming! I say Rush is an idiot...

On Rush Limbaugh's radio show earlier this week, the drug-addled Pillsbury Doughboy said this:

"See, in my humble opinion, folks, if you believe in God, then intellectually you cannot believe in manmade global warming ... You must be either agnostic or atheistic to believe that man controls something that he can't create."

First of all, how can strong religious beliefs be seen as "intellectual" in any context? Such individuals place their blind faith in a person they've never seen before, never heard, never spoken to, never met - yet they give their entire life to this invisible being in hopes that they'll be eternally rewarded after death in a land that they can't prove exists. That's about as "intellectual" as when my dog looks up at the ceiling, looks all around at seemingly nothing, and then goes outside to bark at a blade of grass.

Secondly, even if one believes in God, why is it he or she can't believe in global warming? Here's one thing that's always puzzled me about the Christian religion. There's a group of people that believes in predestination - they believe that God has mapped out a plan for every one of us. However, if that were true, then what would be the point of going to church, praying, and doing good deeds in the name of a higher power, considering we would already have been either selected or rejected to spend eternity in heaven upon our passing? No, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me either. In the other scenario, however, if we were given free will by a higher power, and our eternal fate was decided through our own beliefs and decision-making, then that would make more sense and Mr. Limbaugh's quote would appear to be quite the dumb one.

Mr. Limbaugh, do you believe in God? Yes? Do you believe in free will? If so, then wouldn't it be feasible for God to have created the world, provided mankind free will, and through our own decision-making, we could have caused global warming? The defense rests, your dishonor...

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/08/14/2469341/limbaugh-christians-global-warming/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"