Skip to main content

Apparently Glenn Beck needs a lesson...

To start his radio program yesterday, the man trying to make tinfoil sexy again, Glenn Beck, said this:

"Transgender bathrooms have come out of nowhere and are being jammed down our throat. I guarantee you, I guarantee you the next stop on this train is pedophilia. They will normalize pedophilia."

The slippery slope is a commonly used fallacy right-wing media personalities and politicians have resorted to over the years, especially when it comes to the LGBT community. When the debate was over gay marriage, these individuals would say, "If we legalize gay marriage, what next? Are we going to legalize polygamy? Bestiality? Pedophilia?" Now, I could potentially see polygamy being legalized, because like with marriages between heterosexual and homosexual couples, the relationship is between consenting adults. That isn't the case with regard to bestiality and pedophilia, however, which makes the comparison ludicrous. Similarly, Glenn Beck's slippery slope, as is often the case, misses the mark. According to him, it may have started with "normalizing" marriage between consenting adults of the same gender. Now we're attempting to "normalize" using public restrooms of the gender with which we identify. Then somehow he leaps from this to "normalizing" sexual feelings towards children. It's times like these I really have to wonder how Glenn Beck and his ilk ever passed a 5th-grade English class. They treat the words "transgender," "transvestite," and "pedophile" as synonymous when that's anything but the case. Allow me to explain the differences...

Transgender: "Noting or relating to a person whose gender identity does not correspond to that person's biological sex assigned at birth."

Transvestite: "A person, especially a male, who assumes the dress and manner usually associated with the opposite sex."

Pedophile: "An adult who is sexually attracted to young children."

On the surface, none of these individuals have harmed anyone. However, if we were to look at them following through with the before-mentioned definitions, the only one who does any harm is the pedophile. Of what harm does a man do to another when he dresses up like a woman? Of what harm does a person do when he or she identifies with the opposite gender from that which they were born? Pedophiles, like alcoholics or those with anger-management issues, should seek help and be provided counseling and medication to prevent them from potentially harming anyone. But that's not the case with transgenders or transvestites. While they may be judged by some as being "strange," "confused," or "different," they're not harming anyone, and shouldn't be treated like those who do. Perhaps Glenn Beck should focus his attention less on transgendered women going to the women's bathroom and more on the Dennis Hastert's of the world using any public restroom.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/glenn-beck-i-guarantee-you-next-stop-train-pedophilia

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/transgender

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/transvestite?s=t

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/pedophile?s=t

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...