Skip to main content

#TheBibleHasTaughtMe

In addition to #FakeTabloidFacts, I had some more fun with the trending Twitter hashtag #TheBibleHasTaughtMe over the weekend. Here are my tweets, ordered from the most to the least popular (all my tweets can be read here - https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki):

1) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe that Jesus never said, "I love everyone. Oh, you're gay? I'm sorry, but I can't bake this cake for you."
122 Likes, 48 Retweets

2) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe that "Thou shalt not be gay" & "Thou shalt give to the wealthy while stomping on the needy" are not Commandments
40 Likes, 14 Retweets

3) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe you can't have "Two Corinthians" without First Corinthians (http://www.christianpost.com/news/donald-trump-stephen-colbert-two-2-corinthians-bible-verse-liberty-university-155836/ …)
27 Likes, 11 Retweets

4) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe contradictions will never go endangered, let alone extinct
27 Likes, 5 Retweets

5) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe Jesus was white, Christian, and American. Nevermind, I was taught that elsewhere...
24 Likes, 4 Retweets

6) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe many RWNJs read a different Bible
14 Likes, 4 Retweets

7) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe I should be grateful my parents didn't name me Gad, Ham, Dodo, or Basemath
16 Likes, 1 Retweet

8) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe, when debating capital punishment, it's perfectly reasonable to say, "An eye for an eye, but also turn the other cheek"
10 Likes, 4 Retweets

9) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe insanity is timeless
10 Likes, 2 Retweets

10) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe one needn't be drunk to attempt to walk on water, but there's still a 99% chance that is the case
8 Likes, 3 Retweets

10) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe anything is possible with an imagination, acid, and a way to communicate a message
10 Likes, 1 Retweet

12) #TheBibleHasTaughtMe about eight different types of marriages - http://www.religioustolerance.org/mar_bibl0.htm
4 Likes, 1 Retweet

Totals: 312 Likes, 98 Retweets (Averages of 26.0 Likes, 8.2 Retweets)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"