Skip to main content

The day the PC police came after me...

As long-time readers should know by now, I'm a progressive, a strong ally of the LGBT community, and tend to play it in the middle when it comes to the concept of political correctness. While I think many conservatives have blown the alleged issue of (over)political correctness out of proportion, I do think some take PC matters too far at times. Similarly, while I may satirically tackle subjects in what some see as an unPC manner, the intent of these writings is to showcase the ridiculousness and/or hypocrisy of those whom tend to see political correctness as a bigger issue than it actually is. Having said all that, while I have often times defended political correctness, I do think it goes too far at times, and saw this first-hand a couple days ago.

A couple days ago (or so) the hashtag #ItsNotRadicalToSay was trending on Twitter, so as I tend to do once or twice a week, I had a little fun with it. I took this opportunity to make fun of the modern-day GOP, including many lovely pictures along the way. I showcased Florida Governor Rick Scott next to an alien and garnered several "likes" and laughs, Donald Trump appearing to dress up like an Oompa Loompa with similar results, and likewise with a creepy picture of Ted Cruz, among others. Yet when I jokingly insinuated that far-right author and talking head Ann Coulter might actually be a man, the PC police came banging at my door. I heard the following comments:

- "Why did you have to go there and make fun of Ann's looks? That's pretty low!"

- "Can we stop it with these transmisogynistic jokes?"

- "That's a little transphobic..."

- "It's also not at all progressive."

So, let me get this straight. It's perfectly PC and "progressive" to make fun of Rick Scott's appearance because he resembles an alien, Ted Cruz for appearing kind of creepy, Donald Trump due to his small hands and orange skin tone, Chris Christie because of his weight problem, etc., but poking fun of anti-LGBT commentator Ann Coulter for having some male-like qualities is going too far? Give me a break! ...and again, these PC officers seem to be missing the irony and intent. I wouldn't have ever made such a post about a person who's supportive of equal rights for the LGBT community. But to say Ann Coulter is supportive of the LGBT community would be like to say Stephen Hawking is supportive of horoscope Facebook memes. The post wasn't meant to offend the LGBT community in any way, but to poke Ann Coulter where it hurts, showcasing her in a light which would greatly repulse her, and hopefully making her realize how ridiculous her beliefs are in the process. Was the joke classy and sophisticated in any way? No, but neither is comparing Rick Scott to an alien, Donald Trump to an Oompa Loompa, poking fun of Ted Cruz for looking creepy, or teasing Chris Christie because of his weight problem. It's perfectly fine to get offended by jokes, but let's show a little more consistency, and try to take the person's intent into account before flying off the handles.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"