Skip to main content

The New England Patriots sign Tim Tebow! ...for some reason...

I was just about to celebrate Tim Tebow not playing in the NFL this upcoming season, so I didn't have to hear ESPN talk about him each and every day. However, I'm sad to report that the New England Patriots have apparently signed the former New York Jets' back-up quarterback, so count on ESPN to be talking about nothing but Tebow over the next day or so. ESPN's own Ashley Fox has kicked things off very nicely on that front with an article she released today, entitled, "Tim Tebow is the ultimate challenge - If Belichick makes this work, it will be among his greatest success stories."

Here are some gems from that article:

- "If Belichick makes Tebow into something of a quarterback, if he takes a player with flawed mechanics and faulty footwork and an awkward throwing motion, and actually teaches him the nuances of the passing offense, it will go down as perhaps Belichick's most impressive accomplishment."

- "And this could actually work. If it doesn't, Tebow will have blown his best chance at having the career he maintains he is capable of having, because no one in the NFL believes in him more than Belichick and offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels. No one."

- "Can he succeed again and make Tebow into a legitimate starter in two or three seasons once Brady finally hangs it up? The feeling here is no, that what Tebow lacks can't be taught or fixed. But betting against Belichick can be foolish because he has been right more often than he has been wrong."

Read my lips (yes, through a computer screen) - the New England Patriots did not sign Tim Tebow to be their quarterback - not this year, not next year, not five years from now. So, Ms. Fox and other like commentators can stop drooling at the prospect of Bill Belichick trying to transform Tebow into a quality NFL starting quarterback, because it's not going to happen.

Patriots MVP and Super Bowl-winning quarterback Tom Brady is the team's starter and will continue to be until he retires or suffers a serious injury. The guy is still one of the best in the game today and in the game's history. The team's second-string quarterback is the young and strong-armed Ryan Mallett. Mallett, unless he fails to progress, will likely be the team's starter after Brady. Trust me, it is nowhere in Belichick's plans right now for Tim Tebow to be his starting quarterback at any point.

Why on earth did the Patriots sign him then? Good question. The fact of the matter is, regardless of how sub-par Tebow is as an NFL quarterback, he is still a solid athlete. With the team losing their wideouts from a year ago - Wes Welker and Brandon Lloyd, along with tight ends Ron Gronkowski and Aaron Hernandez fighting injury problems, the offense has more holes at this current juncture than the jeans of an '80s rock singer.

Ms. Fox was right about one thing - Tim Tebow is a "project" for Bill Belichick and the Patriots, but not as a quarterback. The team doesn't need a quarterback. The team needs some help at other positions on offense. I've always said that Tebow is built like a tight end and if he worked on both his blocking and catching, could potentially be a decent tight end in this league. It's by no means a guarantee that with the help of solid coaching, Tebow would ever become a good tight end. However, he has a much greater chance of finding success in the league at that position than at quarterback.

espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9363279/tim-tebow-ultimate-test-bill-belichick

http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/59971/with-tim-tebow-patriots-show-desperation

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"