Skip to main content

The Philadelphia Eagles' starting quarterback is already decided in my mind

There's been a lot of talk at ESPN and elsewhere regarding the Philadelphia Eagles and who their starting quarterback is going to be heading into the coming season. I've read columns making a case for Michael Vick, Nick Foles, and Matt Barkley. Dennis Dixon hasn't even been ruled out in some of these articles. Well, I'll announce Chip Kelly's decision right here and now - barring an injury, Michael Vick is going to be the starting quarterback heading into the season.

This is Vick's last chance with the Eagles. He was signed for one year and nearly $8 million. Former Oregon head coach Chip Kelly and his spread-option offense came to Philly so the team could experiment, take a different path, and also to see what he could do with the explosive, yet risky Vick. If the veteran Pro-Bowl quarterback doesn't produce and the team isn't contending for a playoff spot toward the middle to latter portion of the season, expect 2nd-year quarterback Nick Foles and rookie Matt Barkley to receive some reps, with Dennis Dixon perhaps coming in for spread-option plays. 

Vick may not be starting for the team at the end of the season, but I'd be hard-pressed to think, unless he's injured, that he and his $8 million contract won't be starting heading into it. Dixon has been a backup his entire career. He is capable coming off the bench, but is the likely 4th stringer in my mind. Barkley, being a rookie, probably won't be the starter either. If he impresses coaches pre-season, he could see some playing time later in the season, but it's highly unlikely he'll be the starter either. So, in the end, I think it comes down to Vick and Foles, and while Foles may have shown some potential last year, Vick is a much more ideal quarterback for Kelly's system and I have a hunch the coaches are placing more hope in Barkley being the team's quarterback of the future than Foles. But while Foles and Barkley may be disappointed by the coach's decision, they'll need to be prepared each and every game. While Vick has improved some since coming to Philly on avoiding contact when running, it'll likely be difficult for him to avoid some big hits running the spread-option with any regularity, and the odds of him coming out with at least a brief injury early in the season are at about 1 : 2.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...