Skip to main content

Colin Kaepernick is not anti-American

Before their Friday preseason game against the Green Bay Packers, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick drew headlines by sitting during the national anthem. Kaepernick later explained his actions, saying:

"I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color. To me, this is bigger than football, and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder."

This protest by the Pro Bowl quarterback has generated strong reactions both for and against, with many giving him credit for taking a stand (figuratively speaking) on an important social issue, and others decrying his actions as unpatriotic. Now, while we all have the right to voice our opinions on whether or not we feel Kaepernick was right or wrong in his words and actions, let's get one thing straight - his peaceful protest was anything but anti-American as some suggest.

I find it incredibly troubling that while a majority of NFL spectators are white (men) and a majority of NFL players are black men who make a living by constantly putting their bodies in harm's way, these white spectators seem to consistently tell these black players, "Just shut up and play!" What these spectators seem to fail to realize is that, no matter how rich the players might be, they still face racism much more regularly than whites, such as myself, are accustomed to, and sometimes feel the need to make their voices heard regarding the matter.

Activism is nothing new in the world of sports. Muhammad Ali may be the best example of this, as he publicly stated he wouldn't fight in the Vietnam War. Due to those words of protest, like with Kaepernick, Ali was shunned by many as being un-American. I find this label rather ironic, for isn't it un-American to refer to another as anti-American for utilizing the First Amendment of the Constitution in expressing their opinions, popular or not? If everyone were obligated to hold the same viewpoints, of what value would the First Amendment be?

What's less American, expressing an opinion or telling another to "shut-up" when expressing their opinion?

What's less American, peacefully protesting for a social cause or telling others to stop protesting for this very cause?

What's less American, fighting against oppression or telling others to stop crying about their oppression?

Agree or disagree with Colin Kaepernick's stance on the issues he's openly discussed in recent days, his actions are anything but anti-American. In fact, they're about as American as one could get. He stood tall while sitting, as most of us hid behind our monitors criticizing.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2660303-alex-boone-comments-on-colin-kaepernicks-decision-to-sit-during-national-anthem

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"