Skip to main content

There's no other way to say it: Donald Trump is in serious electoral trouble

While Hillary Clinton currently leads all the national polls by between 5 and 10 points, that doesn't even begin to show how good of shape she's in when it comes to the electoral college. Donald Trump and his supporters can deny it all they'd like, they're in serious trouble. Let's look at the electoral map for a second. Here are very blue states in which Trump has less chance of winning than I do of beating Usain Bolt in the 100 m after drinking with Ryan Lochte (Keep in mind it takes 270 electoral votes to win the election):

1) Hawaii: 4 electoral votes
2) Washington: 12 electoral votes (16 total)
3) California: 55 electoral votes (71 total)
4) Illinois: 20 electoral votes (91 total)
5) Vermont: 3 electoral votes (94 total)
6) Massachusetts: 11 electoral votes (105 total)
7) Rhode Island: 4 electoral votes (109 total)
8) Connecticut: 7 electoral votes (116 total)
9) Delaware: 3 electoral votes (119 total)
10) Maryland: 10 electoral votes (129 total)
11) Washington, D.C.: 3 electoral votes (132 total)
12) New York: 29 electoral votes (161 total)
13) Oregon: 7 electoral votes (168 total)

Here are states that aren't guarantees for Democratic nominees, but they're pretty close:
14) New Mexico: 5 electoral votes (173 total)
15) Minnesota: 10 electoral votes (183 total)
16) Wisconsin: 10 electoral votes (193 total)
17) Michigan: 16 electoral votes (209 total)
18) Maine: 4 electoral votes (213 total)
19) New Hampshire: 4 electoral votes (217 total)
20) New Jersey: 14 electoral votes (231 total)

Here are states which are supposed to be of the "battleground" variety, but on which Trump has pretty much given up given the wide disparities between he and Clinton:

21) Colorado: 9 electoral votes (240 total)
22) Nevada: 6 electoral votes (246 total)
23) Pennsylvania: 20 electoral votes (266 total)
24) Virginia: 13 electoral votes (279 total)

So, unless something major happens to swing one of these states in Trump's direction before election day, Hillary Clinton is at a comfortable 279 electoral votes, 9 more than what is required to win the election. This isn't even taking into consideration the following states, which polls suggest she could also win:

25) Iowa: 6 electoral votes (285 total)
26) Ohio: 18 electoral votes (303 total)
27) Florida: 29 electoral votes (332 total)
28) North Carolina: 15 electoral votes (347 total)
29) Georgia: 16 electoral votes (363 total)
30) Arizona: 11 electoral votes (374 total)

Things are even close in these states:

31) Indiana: 11 electoral votes (385 total)
32) Utah: 6 electoral votes (391 total)

So, I'm sorry Trumpsters. You may solace in your candidate closing the gap in some national polls, but given our electoral college, The Donald is in serious trouble.

http://www.270towin.com/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more