Skip to main content

"How to Stretch the Truth" - brought to you by Donald Trump and his followers

After Khizr and Ghazala Khan's emotional speech in honor of their deceased son, Captain Humayun Khan, at the Democratic National Convention, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump would have been smart to just let things go. Of course, that's not his style, and he felt the need to respond, by saying the following:

"If you look at his wife [Ghazala Khan], she was standing there. She had nothing to say. She probably, maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say. You tell me."

and

"I've made a lot of sacrifices. I work very, very hard. I've created thousands and thousands of jobs, tens of thousands of jobs, built great structures. I've had tremendous success. I think I've done a lot."

First off, you don't call a mother out for being quiet in front of a microphone when having to relive the loss of her son who died in a war. Secondly, you don't compare your business sacrifices to a soldier that lost their life or a family who lost their child in the field of battle. Not only is that insensitive, but frankly, it's stupid. Who, with even half a conscience or brain, would even think about saying such things? No one that I know...

Of course, as has often been the case, when Donald Trump gets called out for saying or doing something stupid, he and his supporters deflect the blame elsewhere. In this case, they've deflected the blame over to the Democratic Party for "using" the family of a slain soldier to score political points. Yes, that's their angle. Let's back up a second here and look at a series of events chronologically:

1) Republican President George W. Bush and his administration send us to war under false pretenses

2) Captain Humayun Khan gets killed in this war (2004)

3) 2016 Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump calls for at least a temporary ban of Muslims traveling to this country

4) Khizr and Ghazala Khan speak at the Democratic National Convention, decrying the wars and Trump's call for a temporary ban of Muslims entering this country

5) Trump, in turn, criticizes the Khans

Trumpeteers' conclusion: The only demographic which should feel ashamed of itself is the Democratic Party for using a fallen soldier's family to score political points.

Let's look at the before-mentioned events again...

Who lied us into war? A Republican president and administration

Under whose watch did Captain Kahn die? A Republican president and administration

Who called for at least a temporary ban of Muslims? A Republican presidential nominee

Who criticized a Muslim-American family that lost a child in the war? A Republican presidential nominee

Yet it's the Democratic Party that should feel ashamed of itself? That's such a stretch, it's like Richard Simmons spandex on steroids! If the Bush Administration didn't lie us into war, Humayun Kahn would still be alive. If Donald Trump didn't call for a temporary banning of Muslims, he wouldn't get called out on it. If he hadn't have criticized the Kahn family, once again, he wouldn't have been called out for it. I think it's high past time the party of "accountability" finally took some personal responsibility, instead of deflecting the blame elsewhere. Mr. Trump, you may firmly believe that the Khans "viciously attacked" you, yet you're still alive and breathing; their son was viciously attacked and can't say the same thing.

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/30/12332922/donald-trump-khan-muslim

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...