Skip to main content

Ann Coulter thinks the two parties are the same

On a recent episode of the Fox News show The Next Revolution with Steve Hilton, conservative commentator and inspirer of the creatures in Alien - Ann Coulter - said this:

"They (Republicans) were exposed as a 'uniparty,' indistinguishable from the Democrats..."

Let's break down just how similar the parties are:

- Democrats believe in women's reproductive rights; Republicans don't.

- Democrats believe in equal pay for equal work; Republicans don't.

- Democrats believe in immigration reform and protecting DREAMers; Republicans don't.

- Democrats believe in building from the bottom up; Republicans believe in trickle-down economics.

- Democrats believe in tax reform benefitting the middle- and lower-classes at the expense of the upper-class; Republicans believe in tax reform benefitting the upper-class at the expense of the middle- and lower-classes.

- Democrats believe in expanding education; Republicans believe in removing education funds.

- Democrats believe in science and protecting the environment; Republicans don't.

- Democrats believe guns should be taken out of the hands of violent and mentally ill individuals, as well as terrorists; Republicans don't.

- Democrats believe in equal rights, regardless of a person's age, gender, race, creed, or orientation; Republicans don't.

- Democrats believe in expanding voting rights; Republicans don't.

Need I continue? Ann Coulter may not like the direction in which her Republican Party, but while she may also loathe the Democratic Party, that doesn't make the two equal. Just because I don't like cigarettes and don't care for Limp Bizkit, that doesn't make the two equal. Ann Coulter may want to take a Critical Thinking course and come up with a more rational explanation.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/392735-ann-coulter-calls-for-gop-to-disband-indistinguishable-from-the
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more