Skip to main content

Michelle Obama: "When they go low, we go high!"

At the 2016 Democratic National Convention (DNC), then First Lady Michelle Obama passionately told supporters, "When they go low, we go high!" "They," in this case, are Republicans. While I'll be the first to admit it's not always easy to adhere to Ms. Obama's calling, there are times it does a grave disservice to our party and cause when we don't.

The most recent such case is with regard to progressives focusing their time, with regard to the immigration debate, on insulting individuals like Melania, Vanessa, and Barron Trump.

First Lady Melania Trump recently released a statement where she said she "hates to see children separated from their families." When visiting with the king and queen of Spain, she added she enjoyed "focusing on the ways we can positively impact children."

Due to these comments, she received the following responses, among others:

- "Yeah, give that a good, hard think. What could you do......?"

- "You're kidding, right? You can start helping children by talking to your husband about changing his policy of separating children from their parents at the border."

- "Impact children??? How's the impact of putting a young child into a concentration camp?"

- "Like letting them out of cages?"

- "Hey Melania - either help us liberate your husband's child concentration camps, or convince him to resign."

- "This has got to be one of the most tone deaf tweet I've ever seen."

- "You can save the children at the border for a start!!!"

- "Uh. The camps..... but nice dress."

- "just white kids tho, right?"

Donald Trump Jr.'s ex, Vanessa, then posted a photo of she and her kids, with the message, "Last trip with my kiddies before their summer camps start!"

At this, she received the following replies:

- "Y'all are so unbelievably tone deaf it's unreal."

- "Oh sweetie. You are so tone deaf. Do you not see how this is so inappropriate since your father in law is caging kids and your poster child for deplorables @IngrahamAngle calls them summer camps? Are you really that stupid?'

- "I hear there are brand new summer camps being built in southern Texas. Laura Ingraham highly recommends them! Is that where you will be sending your children? Full disclosure: you might not get them back."

- "We have a new entry in the 'Soulless Ghoul' competition."

- "What tent city will they be going to? I hear there are some lovely ones in Texas#StopSeparatingFamilies"

Then lastly, actor Peter Fonda tweeted this:

"We should rip Barron Trump from his mother's arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles and see if mother will stand up against the giant a*shole she is married to. 90 million people in the streets on the same weekend in the country. F*ck."

We really need to cut this out. Yes, Melania may be married to Donald, but let's get real here - how much influence on him do you think she really has? The equation isn't too complicated. She married him for his money and he married her as a trophy. In saying that, the marriage doesn't appear to be the happiest in the world. She seems to keep about as much distance with him as I do from a skunk. He's thrown her under the bus more times than The Count would care to, well, you know... Also, when's the last time you saw Donald Trump of all people respect a woman's opinion at all, let alone so much that he'd be willing to implement it as policy? Isn't this philosophy a tad bit sexist as well? Why should it be the First Lady's responsibility to control her man in office, to set his agenda? Why should his screw-ups fall on her shoulders? No, Donald Trump is never one to take personal responsibility for anything, but we sure as hell can and should hold him personally responsible for his screw-ups. That shouldn't fall on the First Lady's shoulders.

With regard to Vanessa Trump, she's not even a member of the family anymore. If First Lady Melania has next to zero sway on The Donald, how in the world do you think it'd be possible for former daughter-in-law Vanessa to hold any?

Lastly, it's wrong on so many levels to wish harm upon any child, regardless of who their parents might be. Progressives regularly lambasted conservatives if they criticized Chelsea Clinton, Malia or Sasha Obama, while their fathers were running this country. That same mindset should be held for Barron as well.

As progressives, it does a disservice to our cause and the Democratic Party if we go low and sling mud back-and-forth with Republicans. It does us no good to go after an uninfluential First Lady, a former member of the Trump family, or especially a 12-year-old boy. Donald Trump and his administration deserve all the criticism in the world for their inhumane separation of immigrant families, but they should be our main target in promoting positive change(s). For as difficult as it may be at times, we need to try and adhere to Michelle Obama's famous words from the 2016 DNC, as an example to our children and the world around us: "When they go low, we go high!"

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/melania-trump-trolled-family-separations-tweeting-wants-positively-impact-children-102927191.html

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/vanessa-trump-called-soulless-ghoul-tweeting-sending-kids-summer-camp-150400090.html

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/393276-melania-trump-contacted-secret-service-after-peter-fonda-tweets-about

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"