Skip to main content

Roseanne, Sam Bee, and Bill Maher walked into a bar...

There's been a great deal of controversy and debate in recent weeks over comedians' jokes and comments: What constitutes as going too far, what's the proper form of punishment, and whether or not there's consistency to the conversies and punishments.

It all started when Roseanne Barr posted several disturbing tweets, the worst of which read, "muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj." VJ stands for Valerie Jarrett, an African-American who worked under then President Obama. ABC has since cancelled her show, Roseanne.

Samantha Bee, host of the late-night TBS political satire series, Full Frontal, not long after, said this on her show: "Ivanka Trump, who works at the White House, chose to post the second most oblivious tweet we've seen this week. You know, Ivanka, that's a beautiful photo of you and your child, but let me just say, one mother to another, do something about your dad's immigration practices, you feckless c*nt!" For the time being, TBS has stood by Ms. Bee, not cancelling her show to this point.

With Roseanne getting cancelled and Full Frontal at least temporarily staying put, many Trump/Roseanne supporters went to Twitter to call for Bill Maher's firing, due to the Real Time host once making the following joke about the president: "Trump is like a love child between a human woman and an orangutan from the Brooklyn zoo." Like with Sam Bee, to this point, Bill Maher has yet to be canned due to his 5-year-old joke (yes, it was uttered in 2013).

Before I share my opinions on the three controversies, let me first say that I've never been a fan of Roseanne Barr; tend to enjoy Samantha Bee's comedy; and kind of have a love-hate relationship with Bill Maher. Having said that, while I do feel both Roseanne and Sam Bee crossed lines with their commentary, I don't feel any of these comedians should have been fired due to it.

Let's first look at Roseanne and be honest with ourselves - the woman has not shied away from controversial remarks, especially in light of Donald Trump's run to becoming the president. If we have been paying attention, how can we say with a straight face that we were shocked by her racist tweet(s)? No, that doesn't make it right, but I have a difficult time seeing how her tweet could have been so shocking, it prompted the cancellation of her show. In my opinion, ABC should have provided Roseanne with a warning, let the public know about this for damage control, and if she crossed a similar line again, fired her.

I hold similar beliefs with regard to Samantha Bee. I have no problem with her going after Ivanka Trump, for Trump's daughter plays an integral role to his administration and tactics. However, referring to her as a c*nt is going overboard. To her credit, Ms. Bee released an immediate apology following the backlash. Like with Roseanne, I feel she should have been provided a warning; TBS should then have let the public know about this, and if she crossed a similar line again, think the show should be cancelled.

It's ironically hilarious Trump supporters went after Bill Maher for his orangutan joke in light of Roseanne getting fired for her racist Valerie Jarrett tweet, because if anything, Maher's joke was the antithesis of Roseanne's tweet. In 2013, Maher offered Donald Trump $5 million to release his birth certificate to prove he wasn't the offspring of a human and an orangutan. Why? He did this as a response to Trump's repeated attempts at getting Barack Obama to release his birth certificate, because you know, he's black and was obviously born in Kenya... Maher was poking fun of/criticizing Trump's racism, while Roseanne was herself being racist. Look, I'll be the first to admit that Bill Maher has said some cringeworthy, borderline fire-worthy things, but this was not one of them.

While I'm not a fan of Roseanne Barr and like Samantha Bee, I feel the both should have been given second chances by their respective networks. Since the repercussions of their actions have differed significantly, we now have to run into the debates about consistency, networks' bias, etc. It'll be interesting to see if this lack of consistency continues moving forward. If so, for the first time in a very long time, I may have to agree with conservatives about there being a bias against them in at least one instance.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/05/29/roseanne-barr-apologizes-racially-charged-tweets-obama-adviser/650973002/

http://money.cnn.com/2018/06/03/media/samantha-bee-addresses-controversy/index.html

http://ew.com/tv/2018/06/02/bill-maher-roseanne-barr-trump-orangutan/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"