Skip to main content

That time I defended both Ivanka Trump and Donald Jr.

I'd say that by now, roughly 98.7% of the U.S. population knows I have about as much love for Donald Trump and his family as a sloth does for Usain Bolt when racing him in the 40-meter. Also, while I feel children of First Families should be generally kept out of the tabloids, since both Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr. are involved in their father's presidency, I think they're fair game. Having said that, though, can we cut it out with the critiques of their photos with their children? Don't we have more substantive things for which we can go after them?

Over the past week or two, both Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. have been loudly criticized on social media for posting pictures of themselves with a child of theirs. Ivanka received a great deal of heat for posting a picture of herself smiling, forehead-to-forehead, with her son while at the Jerusalem U.S. embassy opening ceremony. Donald Jr. was then criticized for posting a picture of himself smiling next to his son, holding his pre-K diploma (yes, there are such things nowadays).

While Ivanka Trump gives feminism a bad name (Bon Jovi better get to working on this track) and under the word prick in the dictionary is a picture of Donald Jr., they're both parents and deserve to be provided a little bit of flexibility in the public eye on that front. I don't care for either one of them, but when it all comes down to it, how would any of us feel to be roundly bashed after posting a picture of ourselves with one of our children? There are plenty of things we can criticize both Ivanka and Donald Jr. for, but let's leave their kids out of it.

https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/ivanka-trump-slammed-for-being-tone-deaf-to-humanitarian-crises-1.6120165

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/donald-trump-jr-probably-didnt-expect-backlash-posted-pre-k-graduation-photo-son-210803508.html
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more