Skip to main content

GOPers' double-standards on the past two presidents

It's pretty amazing to stand back and think about how differently Republican congresspeople, media personalities, and voters have treated the past two presidents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Their knack for the double-standard is really quite incredible.

Let's look at the long laundry list of examples:

- They criticized Obama for being a "celebrity." At no time was Obama the centerpiece of a reality television program. Donald Trump was exactly this on The Apprentice.

- Even Donald Trump himself poked fun at Obama for reading from a teleprompter. Guess who's also read from a teleprompter since his inauguration? That's right - Donald Trump.

- One word: Benghazi. Guess what? A similar ambush occurred under Trump's watch in Niger.

- Remember The Donald's critical tweets of then President Obama's golf outings? Well, funny story, Barack Obama didn't finish his 102nd round of golf until his 1,273rd day in office. For Donald Trump, that feat only took 493 days.

- Obama spent way too much on travel, according to conservatives. However, Trump's travel expenses have cost taxpayers approximately $500,000 more per month than the previous president's did.

- Trump and his cohorts often times described Obama as dishonest. According to Pulitzer Prize-winning fact-check site Politifact, here's how the two presidents compare in terms of honesty:

Obama
Statements graded: 599
True/Mostly True: 288 (48.1%)
Pants on Fire/False/Mostly False: 150 (25.0%)
Net: +23.1%

Trump
Statements graded: 571
True/Mostly True: 94 (16.5%)
Pants on Fire/False/Mostly False: 390 (68.3%)
Net: -51.8%

Difference
Obama: +74.9%/Trump: -74.9%

- Some on the right referred to Barack as King Obama due to the quantity of his executive orders. Humorously enough, though, in 8 years as president, Obama signed 276 executive orders, an average of 34.5 per year. In his first year and a half as president, Donald Trump has signed 75 such orders, which comes to an average of 50.0 per year and puts him on pace for 400 executive orders through 8 years.

The list, like the Energizer bunny, goes on and on and on and on. For as disappointed as I am in Republicans' continued ad nauseum double-standards, I can't say I'm surprised. After all, they made a bigger deal out of Barack Obama wearing a tan suit than of Donald Trump committing an affair with a porn star named Stormy.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-trumps-visits-golf-outpace-barack-obama/story?id=55486647

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/president-donald-trump-s-monthly-travel-costs-three-times-higher-than-obama-s-a8131586.html

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

https://www.federalregister.gov/executive-orders
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more