Skip to main content

My love-hate relationship with Bill Maher continues

Just last week I defended Bill Maher's old joke about Donald Trump being the offspring of a human and an orangutan. As is often the case with Maher, though, I'm quickly following up that defense with a critique.

On his most recent episode of Real Time, Maher said this:

"I feel like the bottom has to fall out at some point, and by the way, I'm hoping for it because I think one way you get rid of Trump is a crashing economy. So please, bring on the recession, Sorry if that hurts people but it's either root for a recession, or lose your democracy."

While Maher has said some cringe-worthy things in the past, he's typically smarter than this. I typically hear such fallacies being uttered by those in the right-wing media. What he's guilty of here is the false dilemma, where he presents a situation as having only two options when there are more. Former President George W. Bush often said, "You're either with us or against us!" No, actually that's not the case. The same holds true for Maher here. I may despise Trump even more than Maher does, but there's no way in hell I'm going to root for another recession, crippling millions of families as a result. That's just crude, insensitive, and not even accurate. It's not like Donald Trump has a great approval rating. He's infuriated the left, infuriated independents, and even infuriated some on the right. There's a reason why so many Democrats, even in the reddest of states, like Alabama, have won special elections since Trump entered the Oval Office. Perhaps due to feelings of remorse and guilt, the media has been on him like glue since Inauguration Day. Speaking of which, Robert Mueller... Oh, and I almost forgot, Stormy Daniels... There are numerous other ways Donald Trump can be legally ousted from his presidency than another recession. Let's hope for one of those options more so than millions of families being crippled due to another recession, and shame on Maher for suggesting otherwise.

http://www.newsweek.com/bill-maher-donald-trump-economy-recession-967984

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"