Skip to main content

GOP turns both cheeks to everyone

Last week I wrote about how the Republican Party has attempted to revise the history of the Civil War and is today almost indistinguishable from the Confederates and Dixiecrats. Something else I've observed in the modern-day Republican Party is that, while they'll fight tooth and nail for a fetus to be born, after that you're on your own, sweetheart. While Jesus said to turn the other cheek when confronted with violence, the GOP has essentially contended that we should turn both our cheeks to everyone, regardless of the tone of the confrontation.

Terms like collectivism, help, share, aid, unity, and togetherness seem to now be foreign to most Republicans. Not only that, but the GOP seems hellbent on believing everything happens for a reason; we're all where we deserve to be; and no excuse can be valid. Where we were born; who our parents are; what school system we were educated in; these are all irrelevant factors in who we've become today. As the GOP repeated ad nauseum in the run-up to the 2012 election, "We built that!"

This is who the Republican Party has become. Fight for birth. Then fight for more wars. Fight for more guns.  Loosen health and environmental regulations. It's every person for themselves. If we make it to the top, we will have earned it every step of the way and we will have done it all by ourselves. Nevermind our parents being the reason we're here in the first place; the essentials they provided us as we grew up; what we learned throughout our school years; the lessons we learned through work; the inspiration and motivation we were provided from our peers and leaders; etc. While we should be proud of our achievements, we also shouldn't lose sight of who and what helped us reach them.

It's ironic many Republican politicians play the Jesus/religion card, contending they worship the Christian messiah and follow his teachings, for Jesus taught kindness, generosity, and sacrifice, the antithesis of what the GOP has become. The modern-day Republican Party revolves around narcissism, plain and simple.

While many GOP leaders may firmly believe their actions coincide with the teachings of Jesus, for most I have to believe it's just a ruse. The Republican Party, dominated by allegedly straight and Christian white men, see their power fading and are doing everything in their power to make it last until they're here no longer. Women, minorities, the LGBT community have all fought long and hard for an equal playing field and have made some significant strides over the past several decades, however, they're still not to where they ultimately want to be and the GOP is putting forth an equal amount of effort to slow the progressions of these marginalized communities. Unfortunately, they've found marketing gimmicks to convince millions to hop on board with them:

- "Guns don't kill people; people kill people."

- "It's Adam and Even, not Adam and Steve."

- "Abortion is murder."

- "Tax-increasing liberals"

- "Illegals are taking our jobs!"

- "Anti-American liberals"

- "We built that!"

Conservative and Republican leaders have essentially brainwashed a good percentage of their base with repeated talking points and bumper-sticker slogans. Facts are of no relevance. Deception is of no consequence. All that matters is what you want to believe, so they've used religion as a crutch to rid themselves of guilt for their prejudices, and instead of practicing what Jesus preached, have decided they're the sun, and to everyone else, turned both their cheeks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"