Skip to main content

No, Representative Waters, that's not how we should go about things...

Democratic California Representative Maxine Waters has come under fire after making the following comments at a weekend rally in Los Angeles:

"You think we're rallying now? You ain't seen nothing yet! Already you have members of your Cabinet that are being booed out of restaurants ... protesters taking up at their house saying 'no peace, no sleep.' Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere. History is not going to be kind to this administration. We want history to record that we stood up, that we pushed back, that we fought and that we did not consider ourselves victims of this president."

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has since responded to Ms. Waters' call with this:

"In the crucial months ahead, we must strive to make America beautiful again. Trump's daily lack of civility has provoked responses that are predictable but unacceptable. As we go forward, we must conduct elections in a way that achieves unity from sea to shining sea."

My heart and mind are conflicted on this. While my heart is with Maxine Waters, my mind is with Nancy Pelosi. No, this isn't a case of an agnostic watching too much Twilight. I understand Ms. Waters' anger and frustration, but what are we if we stoop to the level of those whom we criticize? How can we then rightfully criticize Republicans who refuse service to Democratic officials and the LGBT community if we refuse service to them? It's beginning to feel like an increasing number on the left are, instead of fighting for equality moving forward, are fighting for equality moving backward. Instead of attempting to provide marginalized communities with more rights, we're attempting to strip the rights of those who have more than said marginalized communities. Is that what we really want? Have we simply given up on true progression? If the Republican Party is continually trying to move certain demographics backward, what makes us any different if we're trying to do similarly? Regression is the antithesis of progression, and regardless of how much I want to smack Republican officials upside the head at times or cuss them out in public, I, for one, am not going to appease them any by stooping to their level. Want to stand for progressive ideals and move this country forward? 1) Don't behave like regressive Republicans and 2) Vote!

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/maxine-waters-warns-cabinet-on-street-confrontation_us_5b305621e4b0040e27447208

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"