Skip to main content

Blind Spoken Ironies

Two friends are chatting about random topics one evening. Brad starts going into detail about smoking and its negative, harmful effects. Jeff listens on, as Brad starts pointing out statistics and sources where he found these numbers. "You shouldn't smoke. There's a direct link between that and several forms of cancer, lung in particular," is what Brad finishes his tangent with. All the while, he is smoking.

Have you ever known someone like Brad? They can talk your ear off and even give you lectures on the rights and wrongs of this world and yet, at that very same time, they are committing those same acts they lecture on being wrong?

I admit, I've spoken these blind ironies before. I think most everyone has. People would come to me with their relationship problems and I'd give them advice on what was transpiring and what they should do about it. Then, six months later, when I got involved with someone, I'd fall into the same traps and seem clueless as to what was happening, even though I'd given advice about that same predicament six months earlier. My only excuse or reason for situations like that is the fact that it's much easier to be on the outside looking in on a situation and having an unbiased, realistic perspective. When we're in the situation for ourselves, that vision can very easily be skewed.

When events are spread out like that, I can understand how people can speak in blind ironies. But what makes me really laugh and shake my head is when these events occur simultaneously, like the before-mentioned story about Brad and Jeff. I've heard these statements regarding numerous topics: Relationships, friendships, lifestyles, habits, just about anything and everything.

Perhaps it's very difficult for one to look in the mirror when they're giving advice to another. Deep down, maybe they're thinking to themselves, "Gosh, I've got to work on that," but they want the focus and attention to stay on course. Perhaps some people go on these tangents at times to remind themselves of certain things they need to work on. I don't know. I don't have the answers.

What I do know is whenever I hear these statements, all I can do is smirk, sigh and shake my head. It's humorous, in an odd way, to listen to the Brads give long, in-depth, insightful speeches regarding topics such as the damages of smoking, all while huffing and puffing away on a cigarette.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html