Skip to main content

“Things Happen”

They're only two words, but these works irk me immensely. I've already written a blog regarding the commonly spoken words, "Everything happens for a reason." That line bothers me some, but not nearly as much as "things happen" does, especially in certain predicaments.

Whether it's intentional or not, those who say, "Everything happens for a reason" are "trying" to be sensitive. It's one of those moments when they're speechless, wordless, don't know what to say, so they reach back for that old line their parents told them when they were little and fetch it. They may not come across as being too thoughtful or caring, but deep down, most of the time, they're trying to be sensitive to another's feelings.

"Things happen" is a much more condensed, direct approach in the advice-giving/listening/conversing world. In certain scenarios, this may even be somewhat appropriate. If a couple breaks up after two to three years and the friend of mine whom was involved in the relationship comes up to me and talks to me about things, she may explain that he was obsessed with work, had changed, that they were two different people now, amongst other things. Then, it could work to say, "Well, you know, things happen. It's obvious that you grew up and he didn't. You both sought different things and those ingredients usually don't make for a working relationship." Even then, though, I spoke beyond the "things happen" line, in an attempt to be sensitive. If I had just said, "Things happen," then I don't know how it could be construed as being sensitive. It's so direct, yet so general and could be applied to almost any and every situation. "Things happen. Move on." It sounds like a general in the army.

If one wants to take the statement literally, then yes, things do happen and unless one wants to sit and rot, they will literally have to move on with life. But, how can one compare all situations equally? How can one equally compare a hard day's work to being abused for 20 years? "Things happen. Move on." What about rape? One's mother or father dying? Being abused as a child? Are these the same as falling a few cents short of being able to pay for a whopper, fries and a shake, so one has to settle on buying only two of the three? Does it compare to one missing their favorite program on a certain evening? I'm sorry, but no, it doesn't.

While one moves on in the external world, regardless of the prior events that occurred, it's internally where the true progression (or lack there of) is displayed. Just because I go on a date with someone a few months after a break-up, that doesn't truly mean I'm over the ex and that I've internally moved forward. One can deny those inner feelings all they want, but the longer that the denial is prevalent, the more extreme the contrast between their inner and outer selves.

When one has gone through something traumatic, it usually doesn't help to just say, "Things happen. Move on." This will only make them feel insignificant. One may use the two words "things happen" if they so choose, but use them very carefully. Illustrate a clear picture to the person you're talking to that you are there for them, do care and will listen.

"Things happen. Move on" is perhaps the easiest cop-out of any. It doesn't speak and say, "I love you. I'm here for you. Just talk to me and I'll listen." No, all it says is, "Yeah, yeah, yeah. You've got problems. Guess what? Everyone has problems! That's life! Get over it. Shut up about it already!" Yes, Lieutenant Commander General, Sir!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"