Skip to main content

Another ridiculous Facebook post compares guns to forks

I just saw the following post on Facebook and felt prompted to write about it:

"The Assault Fork
Responsible for
Thousands of People
Dying Every Year
of Obesity And
Heart Disease

(picture of a fork)

Ban It Before
More Lives Are Lost"

This post is obviously trying to be clever by comparing forks and their alleged link to obesity and heart disease (leading to death) to guns and their link to gun violence (leading to death).

These comparisons are getting more and more ridiculous. So we're now comparing a fork, which provides us food, and leads to obesity and heart disease (and death) to a gun, which provides us bullets, and leads to death. First off, a lot of the fattier foods which lead to obesity and heart disease are typically eaten with our hands. I don't know too many people whom eat Big Macs or Whoppers with forks, who eat french fries, onion rings, potato chips, ribs, pizza, or buffalo wings with forks. How about drinking soda pop? The last time I saw someone try to drink a can of soda with a fork was when George W. Bush was dared by his invisible friend Pocahontas to do so. So yes, "clever" Facebook post - let's ban our hands "before more lives are lost."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...