Skip to main content

During tragic times like these, it's time to place politics to the side

Like with any national tragedy, the bombings at the Boston Marathon yesterday brought about much fear, pain, grief, and confusion. Also, while the tragedy prompted many to place others before themselves and showcase the selflessness most people seem to possess in such dire situations - coming together in times of need, others have taken the tragedy to spread conspiracy theories and place blame on the federal government, claiming yesterday's tragedy was a "false flag" operation, orchestrated by the government. The tragic school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut was met with a similar reaction by some. Like with the conspiracy theory surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting being proven false, it's likely that the conspiracy theory surrounding the Boston Marathon bombing will be proven false as well.

On the other side of the political spectrum is Chris Matthews, the host of Hardball on MSNBC, who insinuated that if the bombings were an act of domestic terrorism, they were likely perpetrated by far-right extremists. To this point, there has been no proof of this either.

I understand that in most tragic situations such as the one in Newtown a few months ago or in Boston just yesterday, most people want quick answers for the chaos that ensued. We tend to want a reason for the madness. This can often times lead people to prematurely cast blame on an individual or group they particularly don't like, as was showcased just yesterday with a right-wing conspiracist casting blame on the federal government led by Democratic President Barack Obama and a left-wing talk show host casting blame on right-wing extremists, without any evidence to back up either claim.

To this point, all the facts are not known, including who is responsible for the atrocious acts. So, as much as I can understand wanting an immediate answer to all of one's questions surrounding the tragic events which unfolded yesterday, those "answers" will be clouded in bias and speculation until all the facts come to light. The facts we know at this point are: Three people have died, including an 8-year old boy, and 176 others have been injured, including 17 whom are in critical condition. Now is not the time to be playing politics and casting blame on an individual or group one may not much care for, especially at this juncture, when such accusations are clouded in bias and speculation due to limited evidence. At this time, the only individuals and groups we should be focusing our attention on are those directly impacted by the tragedy - the individuals whom were lost, the families whom were affected, and how we can all reach out to them to provide the necessary aid to help both the city of Boston and the residents of it move forward once again.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/newtown.asp

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/04/what-is-false-flag-attack-boston-bombing/64260/

http://twitchy.com/2013/04/15/detective-chris-matthews-speculates-on-tax-day-jfk-connection-to-boston-bombing/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2309545/Martin-Richard-Boston-Marathon-bombings-victim-aged-8-waiting-father-hug-finish-line.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...