Skip to main content

Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe says the Newtown shooting has nothing to do with the gun debate

While the gun control debate has gone on for decades, it was brought into the national spotlight for the first time in quite a while due to the Newtown tragedy late last year, where 26 people, including 20 6- and 7-year old kids, were shot and killed. It prompted the president to enact numerous executive orders regarding guns, and for him to give a heartfelt speech about the tragedy and looking forward. This has led to potential gun control legislation being debated about in Congress to an extent not seen since the Clinton years.

With Republicans threatening to filibuster a vote on gun control legislation, including the expansion of background checks, eleven family members of the Newtown victims were in this nation's capital yesterday to support this very initiative.

The Newtown victims' families' presence led to Republican Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe to make the following remark yesterday - "See, I think it's so unfair of the administration to hurt these families, to make them think this has something to do with them when, in fact, it doesn't."

When someone pointed out to the Oklahoma Senator that these family members of the Newtown victims felt the gun control debate pertained to them, Inhofe responded with, "Well, that's because they've been told that by the president."

Just when I thought Republican politicians couldn't get any stupider... Is Inhofe seriously suggesting that family members of people whom were shot and killed in the Newtown shooting spree have no relevance to the gun control debate? These are people whom saw their loved ones' lives end tragically via gunshots. They're simply trying to stand up for what they feel is right, help pass legislation which will decrease the likelihood that other families will have to endure what they all did.

When it comes to a Congressional debate regarding equal pay for women, will Inhofe then tell women's group attendees, "See, I think it's so unfair of the administration to hurt these women, to make them think this has something to do with them when, in fact, it doesn't."

Like the phrase, "There's strong and there's army strong," "There's stupid and there's Inhofe stupid."

If he wasn't a member of Congress and attended a Congressional debate over improving our education system, I can just see an individual like himself pointing at him and saying, "See, I think it's so unfair of the administration to hurt James Inhofe, to make him think this has something to do with him, when, in fact, it doesn't." Oh, yes it does...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/09/james-inhofe-guns-newtown_n_3046969.html?1365537752

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"