Skip to main content

"Protect the Environment" label turns conservatives off from conserving energy and the environment

The word conservative is defined as "disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones and to limit change."

Why then is it that a new study shows self-described conservatives are turned off by the thought of helping conserve energy and the environment?

The study, conducted by Dena M. Gromet, Howard Kunreuther, and Richard P. Larrick of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, published the following abstract:

"This research demonstrates how promoting the environment can negatively affect adoption of energy efficiency in the United States because of the political polarization surrounding environmental issues. Study 1 demonstrated that more politically conservative individuals were less in favor of investment in energy-efficient technology than were those who were more politically liberal. This finding was driven primarily by the lessened psychological value that more conservative individuals placed on reducing carbon emissions. Study 2 showed that this difference has consequences: In a real-life choice context, more conservative individuals were less likely to purchase a more expensive energy-efficient light bulb when it was labeled with an environmental message than when it was unlabeled. These results highlight the importance of taking into account psychological value-based considerations in the individual adoption of energy-efficient technology in the United States and beyond."

That's right! If some conservatives are given a head's up via a label they know most liberals would support, this makes them less likely to purchase the product, even if they know it could make a positive difference in their lives and the world at large. I will now list a few other products and their labels that most liberals would support, and while most conservatives may be seriously tempted to buy the products at first glance, they're quickly turned away by the evil liberally-biased labels:

Product: A book

Conservative's reaction: "Well, huh, this looks interesting. I haven't read one for a while. This will be perfect for the flight to Timbuktu or wherever it is my wife and I are going. Where are we going, honey? Oh, Topeka."

Label: "Support education!"

Conservative's reaction: "Oh, hell no! Who do these people think they're fooling anyway? D*mn liberals! Who needs teachers anyway? I ain't never had any."


Product: A safe

Conservative's reaction: "Well, I'll be! I've been looking to get one of these things for a while! With Junior about to be born, I need a safe to stash all my guns."

Label: "Stop gun violence!"

Conservative's reaction: "They just had to go and ruin it, didn't they? Here I'm just looking to buy a safe to prevent accidental gun violence with Junior on his way and they have to push their anti-gun violence agenda on me. I'm looking elsewhere!"


Product: A condom

Conservative's reaction: "It's better to be safe than sorry, I guess. Her husband's out of town and she's already popped out 19 kids. I better be especially careful with this one."

Label: "Practice safe sex"

Conservative's reaction: "Oh no, they didn't! I've had it with these pro-sex schools teaching about condoms! The only thing we should be teaching is abstinence! Abstinence is THE only way we can fully prevent pregnancy! Alright, well, screw this! I'm going to go all in with the adultery unprotected! Here comes #20!"

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conservative?s=t

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/04/26/1218453110

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"