Skip to main content

The former "decider" lets others decide in hindsight via the Decision Points Theater at the George W. Bush Presidential Library

Former President George W. Bush is back in the news and for something that may surprise many. Due to his typically horrendous speeches which left English professors all across the country reaching for Advil, whiskey, a shotgun, and a country song, many wondered if he had difficulty reading off note-cards and teleprompters, or if he could read at all. Well, ladies and gentlemen, not only can the 43rd president of the United States read, he now has a library built in his name!

That's right! The George W. Bush Presidential Library will soon be on full display for us to all see and perhaps convince us that Dubya wasn't such a bad president after all.

Based on what I've read, I think my favorite feature of this library is what's being called the "Decision Points Theater." This is an interactive theater which allows visitors to become hindsight deciders, much like Bush was under then President Dick Cheney. The visitors are presented some information relating to the coming question, are asked the question, respond to it, and then hear Bush give a reason for his actual decision. These questions include: "Should you invade Iraq or leave Saddam Hussein in power?," "Should you deploy federal troops after Hurricane Katrina or rely on local forces?," and "Should you bail out Wall Street or let the banks fail?"

Ah, yes, this will be a fun and realistic venture! I'm sure visitors will receive JUST as much information as the president had in his possession and the decision they make based on the minimal amount of information will be the exact same one they would have made had they been presented with all the information and had to make a decision right then and there as President Cheney, I mean, Bush did.

Looking at Bush's tenure as president of this country, I hope the following questions are asked in the "Decision Points Theater":

- "Would you stick an entire bag of pretzels in your mouth and chew them first or just swallow the whole thing?"

- "Would you be like an OB-GYN and practice your love with women all across this country or be loyal to your spouse like I was to Laura and practice that Comma Shitra thing?"

- "Would you leave children behind by signing the No Child Left Behind Act or not leave them behind by signing some other act?"

- "Would you continue reading a children's book for a while after the Twin Towers were struck or would you place that book down and start reading the kids War & Peace?"

- "Would you invade a country that wasn't responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks like Iraq or would you go after the country that was actually responsible for those attacks - Cuba?"

- "Would you stand in front of a 'Mission Accomplished' banner 8 years before the mission had been accomplished or would you wait for the next president to take all the credit for accomplishing the mission you said you did but didn't actually?"

- "Would you ask Vice President Cheney to apologize for shooting his friend in the face or would you stay quiet and polish his shoes for the second time that day?"

- "Would you quickly decide on what to do with Hurricane Katrina or finish watching the Power Rangers, Teletubbies, and SpongeBob marathons?"

- "Would you ever misunderestimate just how much you would screw up the country or would you misunderestimate that misunderestimation?"
- "Knowing what you know now from the 'Decision Points Theater,' would you call me the worst president or the worstest president?"

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/us/politics/hitting-rewind-bush-museum-says-you-decide.html?_r=1&

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"