Skip to main content

Facebook post attempts to compare gun control to Planned Parenthood...and fails

It's amazing how many political photos and signs are getting spread via the social networking site Facebook. I just saw yet another this morning which showcased President Obama in a cartoon like fashion in a split-screen. On the left side, with the words "gun control" shown at the bottom of the picture, the president says, "If there's a step we can take to save even one child, we should take that step." On the right side, with the words "planned parenthood" displayed at the bottom, Obama says, "Never mind."

This comparison is way off base on a number of levels. I'll, however, just focus on one. Far-right politicians and religious leaders seem convinced that Planned Parenthood is nothing more than an abortion clinic - that almost all of its services are dedicated to abortion. That's not even close to being true.

As showcased by fact-checking site Factcheck.org, abortions represent only 3% of Planned Parenthood's total services. That means 97% of Planned Parenthood's services aren't related to abortion. Here's how the organization's services break down:

Contraception: 35%

Sexually Transmitted Diseases/Infections (STDs/STIs) Testing and Treatment - 35%

Cancer Screening and Prevention - 16%

Other Women's Health Services - 10%

Abortion Services - 3%

Other Services - 1%

Did you notice that first listing? Contraception. In a Guttmacher study conducted by Amy Deschner and Susan A. Cohen, the following was found:

"In countries around the world, women who are determined to limit their family size and time their childbearing will use all available means to do so; if contraception is not a viable option, women will turn to abortion -- even if it is illegal. Extensive evidence demonstrates, however, that when modern contraceptives are made available to women, their increased use over time replaces previous reliance on abortion and becomes the major factor associated with reduced abortion rates. Policymakers seeking to reduce the incidence of abortion would do well to address its root cause -- unintended pregnancy -- by facilitating widespread access to modern contraceptives and by promoting their effective use." That's right - the name of the study is, "Contraceptive Use Is Key to Reducing Abortion Worldwide."

The study and others like it show that whether or not abortion is legal, women will find a way to undergo the procedure. However, this study and others like it also show that with an increase in contraceptive use, there's a decrease in abortion. One of Planned Parenthood's two most utilized services is contraception. In all likelihood, Planned Parenthood and organizations like it are decreasing the number of abortions due to increasing contraceptive use. Like I said, the cartoon is way off base with the comparison.

The one similarity I see as depicted in the cartoon is that Planned Parenthood can be viewed as gun control in a figurative sense, for it provides a man's "gun" with contraception, which will decrease the number of unwanted pregnancies and with that, the number of abortions as well. So while the cartoon attempts to depict the president as being hypocritical, in supporting gun control legislation to save children's lives yet supporting Planned Parenthood which it paints as doing anything but saving children's lives, the cartoonist comes across as looking quite foolish. Whether the far-right wants to believe it or not, Planned Parenthood provides many more services with regard to contraception than abortion, and as numerous studies showcase, greater contraception use results in fewer abortions. So, like with gun control, Planned Parenthood is actually saving children's lives.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151569321146178&set=a.230039551177.135536.6333396177&type=1&theater

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/06/4/gr060407.html

http://www.factcheck.org/2011/04/planned-parenthood/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...