Skip to main content

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is feeling the wrath over Scoobygate

I'm all about fact-checking. I have angered many people in the past when they've laid down a claim I knew to be false, fact-checked said claim, and proved to their dismay that they were wrong. Yet even I will say sometimes, not often, but sometimes we fact-check just a little too much.

Now, I have to imagine like just about everyone else, professional fact-checkers can often times get bored at work. Perhaps it's a non-election year and most politicians seem to be enjoying a vacation of sorts (what else is new, right?), and there really isn't a great deal of interesting quotes or claims to fact-check, so they have to lower their standards a bit and fact-check what really doesn't need to be fact-checked.

The latest example of this is courtesy of Politifact, who fact-checked Republican New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on his claim that Scooby-Doo was his favorite show when he was 4-years old. Yes, Politifact actually fact-checked this.

In the site's ruling, it says:

"Christie told a 4-year old fan of Scooby-Doo at a recent town hall meeting, 'When I was 4, my favorite show was Scooby-Doo, too.'

The governor couldn't have been 4 and been watching 'Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!' since it didn't begin airing until 1969 and hew as born in 1962. That means he would have been 7 years old if he watched the premiere episode of the Hanna-Barbera classic..."

Seriously? What, does Politifact really think Christie's trying to earn the vote of a 4-year old by lying to him? Last I checked, this kid has a few years yet before he can legally vote.

Let's get something straight here - I'm close to 20 years younger than Christie and I can't even remember what my favorite shows were at specific ages, especially those of 25+ years ago. While Christie may have been factually inaccurate with his claim, I highly doubt the guy intentionally lied about it. While I have absolutely no problem with fact-checkers fact-checking Christie when it comes to most of his other statements, I think it's utterly pointless to fact-check whether or not he could have possibly watched Scooby-Doo when he was 4-years old. We're in the midst of an odd trend in the world of politics as far as "-gates" are concerned. We had Watergate, then Lewinskygate, and now Scoobygate. What's next? Napkingate?

http://www.politifact.com/new-jersey/article/2013/apr/21/chris-christie-claims-scooby-doo-was-his-favorite-/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"