Skip to main content

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is feeling the wrath over Scoobygate

I'm all about fact-checking. I have angered many people in the past when they've laid down a claim I knew to be false, fact-checked said claim, and proved to their dismay that they were wrong. Yet even I will say sometimes, not often, but sometimes we fact-check just a little too much.

Now, I have to imagine like just about everyone else, professional fact-checkers can often times get bored at work. Perhaps it's a non-election year and most politicians seem to be enjoying a vacation of sorts (what else is new, right?), and there really isn't a great deal of interesting quotes or claims to fact-check, so they have to lower their standards a bit and fact-check what really doesn't need to be fact-checked.

The latest example of this is courtesy of Politifact, who fact-checked Republican New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on his claim that Scooby-Doo was his favorite show when he was 4-years old. Yes, Politifact actually fact-checked this.

In the site's ruling, it says:

"Christie told a 4-year old fan of Scooby-Doo at a recent town hall meeting, 'When I was 4, my favorite show was Scooby-Doo, too.'

The governor couldn't have been 4 and been watching 'Scooby-Doo, Where Are You!' since it didn't begin airing until 1969 and hew as born in 1962. That means he would have been 7 years old if he watched the premiere episode of the Hanna-Barbera classic..."

Seriously? What, does Politifact really think Christie's trying to earn the vote of a 4-year old by lying to him? Last I checked, this kid has a few years yet before he can legally vote.

Let's get something straight here - I'm close to 20 years younger than Christie and I can't even remember what my favorite shows were at specific ages, especially those of 25+ years ago. While Christie may have been factually inaccurate with his claim, I highly doubt the guy intentionally lied about it. While I have absolutely no problem with fact-checkers fact-checking Christie when it comes to most of his other statements, I think it's utterly pointless to fact-check whether or not he could have possibly watched Scooby-Doo when he was 4-years old. We're in the midst of an odd trend in the world of politics as far as "-gates" are concerned. We had Watergate, then Lewinskygate, and now Scoobygate. What's next? Napkingate?

http://www.politifact.com/new-jersey/article/2013/apr/21/chris-christie-claims-scooby-doo-was-his-favorite-/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...