Skip to main content

No matter how much the far-right contends that Obama is a socialist, numbers suggest otherwise...

I've often found it both frustrating and humorous to hear Congressional Republicans and/or conservative talking heads discuss taxes, especially under President Obama. It's felt as though whenever the words Obama and taxes came up, a light went off inside these individuals' noggins and in unison, they shouted out the word "socialism!" Anymore, socialism appears to be the word most often used by such individuals in an attempt to strike fear into people. I'm not sure why this is exactly. At face value, socialism doesn't appear to be very frightening. It's not like the word is "killyouism" or "goscrewyourmomism" or even "Ihateeverythingthatexistsism." When I think of "social," I think of going out with friends or family, eating a meal, having a drink, and chatting. More times than not, this results in a good time had by all (okay, most). Unless a person is a hermit or a mime, chances are the word "social" doesn't strike a great deal of fear into people. In any case, the word socialism has been flung around by Republican politicians and conservative pundits alike more frequently over the past 4+ years than people over the age of 70 have said "Kids these days!"

No matter how much conservative politicians or talk show personalities like to equate President Obama with socialism, however, this country's tax numbers show a completely different story.

According to the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), when it comes to taxes, the United States is ranked 32nd of 34 developed countries.

In 2010, the U.S.'s total tax revenue (federal, state, and local) was equal to just 24.8% of its GDP, which ranked it ahead of only Chile (19.6%) and Mexico (18.8%). The average number for the 34 developed countries was 33.4%, a full 8.6% greater than what was collected in the U.S. that year - the most recent year for which the OECD has released data. Yeah, that's socialism alright, as much as a 20% score on an exam is brilliance-ism... What does socialism mean again? Sometimes I want to get in touch with my inner The Princess Bride and respond to these far-right politicians and media personalities, "You keep using that word ("socialism" as opposed to "inconceivable"). I do not think it means what you think it means."

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/08/1834981/the-us-collects-less-in-taxes-than-all-but-two-industrialized-countries/

http://ctj.org/ctjreports/2013/04/the_us_continues_to_be_one_of_the_least_taxed_of_the_developed_countries.php#.UWRX78qbWB2

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...