Skip to main content

#TrumpSpeechInFourWords

I had some fun with the trending hashtag #TrumpSpeechInFourWords on Twitter yesterday. Here are my posts, ordered from the most to least popular (all my tweets can be seen here - https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki):

1) We've all been punked
#TrumpSpeechIn4Words
69 Likes, 18 Retweets

2) "Everyone is gonna die!"
#TrumpSpeechIn4Words
54 Likes, 13 Retweets

3) Is it over yet?
#TrumpSpeechIn4Words
46 Likes, 10 Retweets

4) Idiocracy comes to life
#TrumpSpeechInFourWords
42 Likes, 13 Retweets

5) Lie every other sentence
#TrumpSpeechInFourWords
34 Likes, 13 Retweets

6) Have we gone crazy?
#TrumpSpeechInFourWords
29 Likes, 8 Retweets

7) Make America Suck Again
#TrumpSpeechIn4Words
29 Likes, 7 Retweets

8) Overtime for fact checkers
#TrumpSpeechIn4Words
13 Likes, 8 Retweets

8) Most annoying sound ever
#TrumpSpeechIn4Words
18 Likes, 3 Retweets

10) Monotone yelling sounds like...
#TrumpSpeechIn4Words
12 Likes, 1 Retweet

Totals: 346 Likes, 94 Retweets (Averages of 34.6 Likes, 9.4 Retweets)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"