Skip to main content

An Imaginary Barack Obama

Over the past couple weeks or so, I've several people - the president included - whom have claimed that the Republican Party have attempted to create an imaginary Barack Obama. This theory really came to fruition when actor Clint Eastwood spoke at the Republican National Convention and pretended to have a conversation with Obama courtesy of an empty chair. To that which the empty chair could attest - the GOP has definitely created an imaginary Barack Obama.

Let's take the chain e-mail fact-checking site, Snopes.com, to further illustrate this. President Obama hasn't even been in office for four years and there have been, at one point or another, 125 e-mails spread about him. Of these 125, only 17 are true (13.6%). As four have been undecided as far as how much validity they contain, that means 104 of the 125 e-mails are, on some level or another, false (83.2%). If the four undecided e-mails are false as well, that would mean that 86.4% of those 125 e-mails are false in some manner or another.

What do these e-mails showcase? Especially the false ones? That someone, somewhere down the line, believed the e-mail to be true (or wanted to believe it) and passed it on to friends and family. What do some of these e-mails claim? That Obama is/was: Not a natural-born citizen of the United States, the anti-Christ, a Muslim, endorsed by the Ku Klux Klan, sworn into office on the Koran, born in Kenya, a Black Panther, using the Social Security Number of a man born in 1890, etc.

How can anyone in their right mind believe this nonsense? Simple - because they want to believe it. I don't know what it is about President Obama that many of these people don't like or are afraid of - whether it's his name, skin color, actual policies, party affiliation, former pastor or what exactly - but they make it appear as if it's their goal in life to hate this man and find every reason (real or not) to do so.

Clint Eastwood's discussion with the empty chair perfectly exemplified what Barack Obama is to the Republican Party. He wasn't there, so they could make him up as they'd like to see him - a man they could hate and who would be easy for them to vote against. To them, this boogie monster, known to most as Barack Obama, is nothing but a: Marxist, socialist, communist, Muslim, Satanist, baby-killing, anti-war, anti-success, taxer, spender, liberal, anti-troop, anti-American, selfish, arrogant, elitist, angry, racist, criminal foreigner. Many people fear what they don't understand. To most Republicans, Barack Obama is this person they don't understand and unfortunately, they've never even tried doing so.

http://snopes.com/politics/obama/obama.asp

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"