Skip to main content

Guns in classrooms? Really?

So, the University of Colorado-Boulder will allow students to carry guns to class. In March, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled in favor of this - allowing students to bring guns into classes and labs.

A professor at Boulder - Jerry Peterson - said in response to this ruling - "My own personal policy in my classes is if I am aware that there is a firearm in the class -- registered or unregistered, concealed or unconcealed -- the class session is immediately canceled. I want my students to feel unconstrained in their discussions."

Chancellor Phillip P. DiStefano responded to Peterson with the following: "I have the utmost respect for Professor Peterson, who is an old friend and valued colleague, but I want to make clear that if a student carrying the weapon has a concealed-carry permit, the position implied by Professor Peterson's comments directly violates Colorado law and the operating principles of the campus."

That makes sense. I'm sure students, teachers and parents alike will feel very safe and secure in knowing there may very well be students carrying guns in classrooms. It won't prove to be a distraction at all. All college kids are mature and there's no chance of someone losing their cool and whipping out their gun or another seeing and stripping it from them. No, there's no chance of that at all. There's no chance of a college kid getting high or drunk before class and doing something they may later regret with regard to a loaded gun. Geez...at the rate we're going, we'll soon see laws passed which will make it legal for newborns to carry loaded rocket launchers in daycare.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/22/cu-boulder-chancellor-peterson-guns-on-campus_n_1822550.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i...