Skip to main content

The dismissing of race as an issue

I've heard many Republicans lay claim that whenever they criticize President Barack Obama, they're called a racist. They then say something along the lines of, "Here I thought that liberals and Democrats were supposed to be the party of acceptance, diversity and open-mindedness. I guess that's not the case when someone disagrees with them."

I can't speak for everyone (figuratively or literally - I'm exhausted from just thinking about doing that in the literal sense), but the only time I really question if a person dislikes the president because of his skin color is when they show a fear and hatred toward him and don't provide any reason as to why this is.

If a person told me he or she couldn't stand the president and then talked about him not closing Guantanamo, compromising on FISA and the Patriot Act, not fighting harder for a public option in his healthcare bill, not ending the war in Afghanistan quick enough, not being tougher on gun laws, etc., then I'd be more understanding on the matter. However, over 90% of the time, that isn't the case. When I hear a person talking in such an angry manner toward the president, what usually spews forth from their lips are nothing but slogans, talking points and debunked claims. Granted, they may genuinely believe these slogans, talking points and myths. However, even after I present them evidence to the contrary, they still believe whatever it was they told me. In cases like that, I have to seriously wonder what the actual reasons are behind despising the man so much, and as I've come to learn, many people hide behind lies to deny themselves and others what they don't want known.

This reminds me of just a recent example, where a woman I know posted a status on Facebook which talked about how, while she was on Medicaid and believed in gays' rights, she's a Republican and will be voting for Romney. Under the Romney/Ryan plan, significant cuts would be made to Medicaid and both have, at one point or another, stated that they believe in adding an amendment to the Constitution to ban gay marriage. I then asked a good friend of mine about her status, for it perplexed me. He knows her quite well and said, "The real reason is she told me that she'd never vote for a black guy."

While we can't claim with any validity whatsoever that one group of people or another is overwhelmingly racist, we also can't deny that racism still exists and plays a factor in some's thinking as well as voting.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...