Skip to main content

What I'd give to be a replacement ref

I seriously wonder how much these NFL replacement refs are making and once I hear the number, if I can apply for the job. Based on the calls I've seen in the first two weeks of the season, there's a decent chance I could do just as well, if not better than these refs.

In Week 1, the Seattle Seahawks were given four timeouts in the second half of their 20-16 loss to the Arizona Cardinals. Last I heard, teams possessed only three timeouts in each half. I'm now being told this is true, but Seattle had access to a get-a-free-timeout coupon it saw in their local paper and the referees accepted it.

This same thing benefited the Detroit Lions in their opening week come-from-behind win against the St. Louis Rams, as they were afforded a fourth timeout in the second half. Rumor has it that Lions head coach Jim Schwartz bribed the replacement officials with Monopoly money and they took it.

Forty-four seconds magically vanished from the clock pending a challenge from Pittsburgh Steelers' head coach Mike Tomlin in the Steelers' opening-week loss to the Denver Broncos. These particular 44 seconds haven't been spotted since, but are said to be taking a vacation in Hawaii.

Toward the end of the game yesterday between the Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore Ravens, the Eagles were down 23-17 and driving when quarterback Michael Vick threw the ball forward just before being taken to the ground. Balitmore jumped on the ball and the referees looked at one another like deer look at headlights, before finally signalling it was Baltimore's ball. Upon review, as most blind men could see, the referees saw that it was an incomplete forward pass and not a fumble.

Refs are often times made to be scapegoats for a team's loss. Once in a great while, this can happen, but most every time, the team itself lost the game. But so while referees typically won't be receiving too many nice gifts in their stockings around Christmas time from NFL players and fans, they are being sorely missed by the league and its fans now, because these replacement refs are providing more comedy than Dane Cook after giving his audience a good dosage of nitrous oxide. I'm just waiting for the moment when a replacement ref signals a penalty for a false start, but calls it traveling, that or he calls a touchdown a home run. Sadly, after watching the officiating these first two weeks of the NFL season, I think those ridiculous events are quite possible.

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2012/9/12/3315192/nfl-replacement-referees-mistakes-week-1

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"