Skip to main content

It's official - Romney's a stoner

A few days ago, when asked if he was going to be campaigning more as the election draws nearer, Mitt Romney said: "Ha ha. We're in the stretch, aren't we? Look at those clouds. It's beautiful. Look at those things."

After reading that quote, how else could we explain Romney's words other than he was high at the time?

Having read that odd quote by Mr. Romney, I envision him answering the following questions in a similar manner:

Question: "Mr. Romney - the public doesn't seem to be warming up to the Romney/Ryan plan for Medicare. How do you plan on winning them over on that front?

Romney: "Yes, that's true. Did you watch the game last night? Good game. The ball was really large. It just kind of stuck out. Very pretty."


Question: "Mr. Romney, sir - why do you suppose you're down in the poll?"

Romney: "Ah - polls. I could really go for some Polish sausage right now. Does anyone have any Polish sausage on them? Mm... Polish sausage. Polls. Yum."


Question: "What do you say to the people who feel that you've flip-flopped on healthcare reform?"

Romney: "I care about health - that's why it's called healthcare. Ha ha. Ooh, it's raining now. Whenever it rains, I feel like singing 'In the Navy' and dancing. Oh, here I go again. I've got moves. Would you all excuse me for a moment? I must be one with Mother nature and her music."


Question: "The American people feel that raising taxes on the wealthiest is the right thing to do. How do you plan on convincing them otherwise?"

Romney: "Money is good. I like money. It's paper and paper is good. I made a paper airplane this morning and flew it all about the galaxy. It was so much fun."


Question: "Mr. Romney - do you regret your 47% comments?"

Romney: "47, 54, 2, 9, 6, 18, 49, 17, 3... Ooh, did you see that grass over there? It's so green! Green's fun to say. Green, green, green, green... la la la la..."

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/09/mitt-romney-appreciates-cloud.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"